bones said:
If Kingy was on the same money that Kite was on, then I'd say he would have been moved on. Kite was let go to free up cap space, and letting Kite go freed up more cap space than what letting King go would have.
in fairness Bones you have zero idea what Kite or King were/are being paid so your entire post is void and mere speculation.
more to the point, props don't age well. Kite put in a big year for us in 2013 but he isn't the player he was in his younger years that's obvious.
King worries me for the same reason.