Jason King or Brent Kite?

bones said:
If Kingy was on the same money that Kite was on, then I'd say he would have been moved on. Kite was let go to free up cap space, and letting Kite go freed up more cap space than what letting King go would have.
in fairness Bones you have zero idea what Kite or King were/are being paid so your entire post is void and mere speculation.
more to the point, props don't age well. Kite put in a big year for us in 2013 but he isn't the player he was in his younger years that's obvious.
King worries me for the same reason.
 
bazeagle said:
bones said:
If Kingy was on the same money that Kite was on, then I'd say he would have been moved on. Kite was let go to free up cap space, and letting Kite go freed up more cap space than what letting King go would have.
in fairness Bones you have zero idea what Kite or King were/are being paid so your entire post is void and mere speculation.
more to the point, props don't age well. Kite put in a big year for us in 2013 but he isn't the player he was in his younger years that's obvious.
King worries me for the same reason.

I'd imagine Bones is just applying common sense. Add to the fact that Kite was off contract & King wasn't & Kite has close to 300 games on the clock... it's a no brainer.
 
Mals said:
bazeagle said:
bones said:
If Kingy was on the same money that Kite was on, then I'd say he would have been moved on. Kite was let go to free up cap space, and letting Kite go freed up more cap space than what letting King go would have.
in fairness Bones you have zero idea what Kite or King were/are being paid so your entire post is void and mere speculation.
more to the point, props don't age well. Kite put in a big year for us in 2013 but he isn't the player he was in his younger years that's obvious.
King worries me for the same reason.

I'd imagine Bones is just applying common sense.

That would be a first.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom