Injury prone?

The Who

Journey Man
This may be my Manly bias showing through but I perceive us to have a lot of injury-prone players. I welcome a statistician to confirm or refute my perception.
Follows is my injury/availability assessment of some of our current players:
Turbo = 40% available
Tent = 55%
Alaoi = 55%
The Lawman = 45%
Burbo = 55%
I'd image an average availability 'pass mark' for an NRL player would be 75% (available for three out of every four matches). Over the years we've had warhorses such as Lyons, Lyon, Beaver, Tooves and Ballin, and currently DCE (must be 98%), Jurbo and Froggy (must both be 90%) available.
Thoughts?
 
IMG_3953.jpeg
 
team Injuries perspective

Injuries are part of the game
Resilience and over coming adversary and keep winning is part of the character in the team that a Great coach can Inspire
 
Is that the cumulative number of weeks players have been injured for (5+ weeks)?
It is yet another reason why Penrith has been so dominant, although the major reason is that they have such a high number of quality players and back-ups.
That’s the total number of 5+ weeks injuries to a player, so of our 42, Tom would have at least 3-4 of those I think

That does illustrate the unbelievable run of Penrith, and also how badly the Tigers and Dragons have performed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe
  • lsz
    First Grader

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 14 11 0 3 96 24
2 Bulldogs 12 10 0 2 92 24
3 Warriors 13 10 0 3 35 24
4 Storm 12 8 0 4 171 22
5 Sharks 14 8 0 6 26 18
6 Broncos 13 6 0 7 44 16
7 Panthers 13 5 1 7 -9 15
8 Cowboys 12 5 1 6 -52 15
9 Dolphins 13 6 0 7 92 14
10 Sea Eagles 14 6 0 8 22 14
11 Roosters 12 5 0 7 -22 14
12 Dragons 13 5 0 8 -59 14
13 Tigers 13 5 0 8 -62 14
14 Rabbitohs 13 6 0 7 -82 14
15 Knights 13 5 0 8 -65 12
16 Eels 13 4 0 9 -105 12
17 Titans 13 4 0 9 -122 12
Back
Top Bottom