Injury prone?

The Who

Journey Man
This may be my Manly bias showing through but I perceive us to have a lot of injury-prone players. I welcome a statistician to confirm or refute my perception.
Follows is my injury/availability assessment of some of our current players:
Turbo = 40% available
Tent = 55%
Alaoi = 55%
The Lawman = 45%
Burbo = 55%
I'd image an average availability 'pass mark' for an NRL player would be 75% (available for three out of every four matches). Over the years we've had warhorses such as Lyons, Lyon, Beaver, Tooves and Ballin, and currently DCE (must be 98%), Jurbo and Froggy (must both be 90%) available.
Thoughts?
 
IMG_3953.jpeg
 
team Injuries perspective

Injuries are part of the game
Resilience and over coming adversary and keep winning is part of the character in the team that a Great coach can Inspire
 
Is that the cumulative number of weeks players have been injured for (5+ weeks)?
It is yet another reason why Penrith has been so dominant, although the major reason is that they have such a high number of quality players and back-ups.
That’s the total number of 5+ weeks injuries to a player, so of our 42, Tom would have at least 3-4 of those I think

That does illustrate the unbelievable run of Penrith, and also how badly the Tigers and Dragons have performed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom