Thank you.
So which is it? Paying overs or brown that got players to Newcastle.
Seems as though you think it's all about the cash, so I'll let you sleep well at night.
I couldn't care less if clubs pay overs or not, my argument has been why Brown is the right person for the job, and it had shown at Newcastle that he was able to attract the right players to improve where the club is at, which he has done and has handed over a decent roster that O'Brien can work with to make the Knights into a premiership force over the next 2 years
There's a difference between paying overs for the wrong players compared to the right players, and the Warriors under Kearney paid overs for the wrong players consistently. .
Last edited: