Mal Cochrane
I'm not really Mal Cochrane...
Symonds is not in 1st grade for a reason. Especially with Buhrer back and Mateo to come, i don't see the need to bring Symonds back in.
Symonds is not in 1st grade for a reason. Especially with Buhrer back and Mateo to come, i don't see the need to bring Symonds back in.
So you agree about Buhrer, and think by all rights Mateo is in front of Symonds & Leary, but begin with whether I am still suffering from a head knock?
probably, because I'd have you in there ahead of Symonds. Look, that is going a bit far, and he is a good footballer who occasionally runs some good lines, but that's about it. I've seen enough, i don't think he would make any other teams apart from Knights atm...I just don;t think he offers enough, that's just my opinion.
I'll tell you what's frustrating is having the lineup we have and won't make the top 8.
You can't have a fullback unwilling to run the ball back anymore.
That's exactly what DCE needs. DCE at the moment can't be creative on both side.@Dan are you judging Api's performance at half by the way he brilliantly directed the attack and superbly feed his outside players?
Api is a great individual player, but he is not a half or 5/8's backside.
That's exactly what DCE needs. DCE at the moment can't be creative on both side.
Api showed more promise in 2 games than Walker has in all other games
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 7 | 1 | 109 | 16 | |
8 | 7 | 1 | 56 | 16 | |
8 | 6 | 2 | 66 | 14 | |
8 | 5 | 3 | 51 | 12 | |
9 | 5 | 3 | 37 | 11 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 95 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | 42 | 10 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | 25 | 10 | |
9 | 5 | 4 | -14 | 10 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -16 | 8 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -19 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 8 | |
9 | 4 | 5 | -70 | 8 | |
9 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 7 | |
8 | 2 | 6 | -63 | 6 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -89 | 4 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -166 | 4 |