Drinking mate?His interview about the possible recruitment of Naden says it all - "Nado's a really good mate of mine."
Certainly came across that way - Trent's coaching methodology revolves around his popularity with the players.Drinking mate?
That is a pretty crap team tbh. The backline and bench look awful.Guess ? It is obvious which year it was . It was the year the U/20 missed the finals
This is the team that Trent inspired to 2nd last avoiding the spoon in his solo head coach in 2018. The year he fell out with bozo and did it all on his own.
He quit because he did not have the resources that he was promised but the fact is he did not make the most of the greatest resources in the competitive team that he had.
Now at the dogs he has the best of the best of resources and he had money to spend to strengthen his team that the previous coach did not have the luxury and the results are 6 games and 6 loses. The myth of Trent being a great attacking coach exploited when his team was scoreless in 3 games .
The moral of the story
Trent is a very popular guy with players and the media and he had a great ride to getting a Head coach job but his ride is running out of gas because as usual he is running out of excuses and running out of results on the field where it matters
A blast from Trents past ...This team came 2nd last
Tom
Wright
kelly
Suli
Parker
Walker
DCE
AFB
Fainu
Kappow
Thompson
Lane
Jake
Res
Paseka
Sipley
Winterstien
Hodginson
That's why he's a terrible head coach. Having an assistant who's friendly with the players would have a lot of advantages. The head coach needs to be respected, and needs to have an authority that the players respond to. That game where we thumped Parra 54-0 and Barrett took the whole squad out for beers was the death of his chances of being an effective coach here.Certainly came across that way - Trent's coaching methodology revolves around his popularity with the players.
Perspective time ...That is a pretty crap team tbh. The backline and bench look awful.
The spine is fine, although Walker was an ordinary 5/8. Paseka and Sipley were only just starting to show promise then. Tom is the only good player in the back 5.Perspective time ...
Any team with the spine of Tom Fainu and DCE is not crappy
We also had the Best meter eater in AFB
The Bench . Paseka and Sipley are not crappy
The backs Walker and Tom are not crappy
And we all know what impact Tom does to a team
But under Baz . the Manly Team with Tom came second last . That is what impact Baz had on our team
Perspective timeThe spine is fine, although Walker was an ordinary 5/8. Paseka and Sipley were only just starting to show promise then. Tom is the only good player in the back 5.
One thing we can both agree on is that the team should have played much better than they did. But If I had to choose between the team we had then and the team that took the field for us last week it's a no brainer.Perspective time
Walker was not a Croker at 5/8
Paseka and Sipley were very promising and not ordinary as what you posed
As I said before Tom does make a difference to our other back line players as we saw last week
But under Baz the affect of Toms presence was our team finishing second last
Fainu and AFB that are missing are both high impact playersOne thing we can both agree on is that the team should have played much better than they did. But If I had to choose between the team we had then and the team that took the field for us last week it's a no brainer.
That is why Bozo used Tom's name four times!The spine is fine, although Walker was an ordinary 5/8. Paseka and Sipley were only just starting to show promise then. Tom is the only good player in the back 5.
The Great Tom made no difference under Baz when our team came second lastThat is why Bozo used Tom's name four times!
The spine is fine, although Walker was an ordinary 5/8. Paseka and Sipley were only just starting to show promise then. Tom is the only good player in the back 5.
Perspective time ...
Any team with the spine of Tom Fainu and DCE is not crappy
We also had the Best meter eater in AFB
The Bench . Paseka and Sipley are not crappy
The backs Walker and Tom are not crappy
And we all know what impact Tom has on a team
But under Baz . the Manly Team with Tom came second last . That is what impact Baz had on our team
We had a Killer spine thoughI agree with those players you have nominated Bozo. We did have some talent there. We also had some turkeys. But they should have performed far better than they did.
Those players should be proud of that effort... I know you didn't want a win for TB KW but the doggies players tackled their asses off and congrats to themWell, it only took the disjointed Sharks having a man binned and bombing seven tries, but the attack coach has his first win of the year. A six point victory - they better enjoy it - I don't think there will be many of them to celebrate this year.
Their defence was good on their line tonight. But I will never congratulate the Dogs mate. They are right up there with my most despised clubs.Those players should be proud of that effort... I know you didn't want a win for TB KW but the doggies players tackled their asses off and congrats to them
Fair enough... im like that with tigpies...Their defence was good on their line tonight. But I will never congratulate the Dogs mate. They are right up there with my most despised clubs.
Cronulla could have scored six or seven as well. Even the mid table sides would have converted most of those chances.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |