No - a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, Cam 😉CAMBO said:Hey I got a distinction for Intro to Law last semester does that qualify me as one of Silvertails legal eagles 🙂
(but congrats on your result)
No - a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, Cam 😉CAMBO said:Hey I got a distinction for Intro to Law last semester does that qualify me as one of Silvertails legal eagles 🙂
CAMBO said:Lol that's goldAlan said:Dan said:I think that this post has had the desired effect now let splay nice at least until the first major controversy of the season, then we can open duck season again
With respect, I doubt we should dismiss the issue of legal notices so easily. As an administrator of this site I feel that you should have a duty of care to your members, and inform us of the "posting names" of individuals who have previously threatened legal action.
I for one would wish to know prior to posting a robust and vigorous response that I was potentially dealing with an anal retentive adult bed-wetter, and therefore would only express my alternate opinion in a positive, constructive, and nurturing way. :
Las Vegas Blvd said:No Cambo , lol Susan
Hey I got a distinction for Intro to Law last semester does that qualify me as one of Silvertails legal eagles 🙂
Darren said:Is that an Eagle Boys diploma Cam? 😛
Dan said:Nuttybott said:I am not playing ANY "card", Dan. I didn't write the site rules. I am simply suggesting that if you expect others to observe those rules, you should also observe them yourself...Dan said:Nuttybott said:Re: the title of this thread - from the Terms of Use:
"You agree not to use any obscene, indecent, or offensive language"
Does this rule not apply to ALL members, including the site owner? If so, it should be observed and enforced... :huh:
Really? You are going to play that card?
I won't go our that with a response
Should I?
Should I apply all the same rules? Should I make everyone a part of what I have to do to keep this site going?
The swearing rule is more aimed at vilification, we let swearing go 99% of the time, unless it is directed specifically at members, it is to prevent vilification and personal arguments from getting beyond control and things getting personal.
Its sad that some people can't heed the advice I have given here because, really I am tired of all the lack of respect, tit for tat and ridiculous stuff that is going on. I am seriously at the point where I either just start banning people permanently or I just shut the site down.
Fluffy said:Dan said:Nuttybott said:I am not playing ANY "card", Dan. I didn't write the site rules. I am simply suggesting that if you expect others to observe those rules, you should also observe them yourself...Dan said:Nuttybott said:Re: the title of this thread - from the Terms of Use:
"You agree not to use any obscene, indecent, or offensive language"
Does this rule not apply to ALL members, including the site owner? If so, it should be observed and enforced... :huh:
Really? You are going to play that card?
I won't go our that with a response
Should I?
Should I apply all the same rules? Should I make everyone a part of what I have to do to keep this site going?
The swearing rule is more aimed at vilification, we let swearing go 99% of the time, unless it is directed specifically at members, it is to prevent vilification and personal arguments from getting beyond control and things getting personal.
Its sad that some people can't heed the advice I have given here because, really I am tired of all the lack of respect, tit for tat and ridiculous stuff that is going on. I am seriously at the point where I either just start banning people permanently or I just shut the site down.
Don't ... give in to them Dan. Sure you may be stoned from your latest visit to the cafe but we gots to keep this ... going.
Dan said:Fluffy said:Dan said:Nuttybott said:I am not playing ANY "card", Dan. I didn't write the site rules. I am simply suggesting that if you expect others to observe those rules, you should also observe them yourself...Dan said:Really? You are going to play that card?
I won't go our that with a response
Should I?
Should I apply all the same rules? Should I make everyone a part of what I have to do to keep this site going?
The swearing rule is more aimed at vilification, we let swearing go 99% of the time, unless it is directed specifically at members, it is to prevent vilification and personal arguments from getting beyond control and things getting personal.
Its sad that some people can't heed the advice I have given here because, really I am tired of all the lack of respect, tit for tat and ridiculous stuff that is going on. I am seriously at the point where I either just start banning people permanently or I just shut the site down.
Don't ... give in to them Dan. Sure you may be stoned from your latest visit to the cafe but we gots to keep this ... going.
Cafe's sell coffee, food and drinks.
Coffeeshops sell weed
I've been to neither, Couldn't be bothered catching a tram into the city
Fluffy said:Dan said:Fluffy said:Dan said:Nuttybott said:I am not playing ANY "card", Dan. I didn't write the site rules. I am simply suggesting that if you expect others to observe those rules, you should also observe them yourself...
Should I?
Should I apply all the same rules? Should I make everyone a part of what I have to do to keep this site going?
The swearing rule is more aimed at vilification, we let swearing go 99% of the time, unless it is directed specifically at members, it is to prevent vilification and personal arguments from getting beyond control and things getting personal.
Its sad that some people can't heed the advice I have given here because, really I am tired of all the lack of respect, tit for tat and ridiculous stuff that is going on. I am seriously at the point where I either just start banning people permanently or I just shut the site down.
Don't ... give in to them Dan. Sure you may be stoned from your latest visit to the cafe but we gots to keep this ... going.
Cafe's sell coffee, food and drinks.
Coffeeshops sell weed
I've been to neither, Couldn't be bothered catching a tram into the city
meh up to you, i was merely trying to be funny by swearing for effect rather than abuse as per some of those posts. unfortunately the swear filter picks up me and not you so i look like a dick
well at least when i call myself a dick that gets through......
Darren said:Could be Pepperoni vs Cheesy Crust.
CAMBO said:Darren said:Could be Pepperoni vs Cheesy Crust.
No Darren I much perfer to read about
The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
Interesting case they made a movie about it, you may of heard of "Inherit the Wind"
Personally I'd rather believe an academic like Charles Darwin over a mythological identity.
Las Vegas Blvd said:CAMBO said:Darren said:Could be Pepperoni vs Cheesy Crust.
No Darren I much perfer to read about
The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
Interesting case they made a movie about it, you may of heard of "Inherit the Wind"
Personally I'd rather believe an academic like Charles Darwin over a mythological identity.
Im guessing it wasnt NSW Police v B.Stewart
Abbey Ale is the way to go. My young bloke brought around a case and it's excellent.mozgrame said:Wish I had a case of crowns.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
4 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
5 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
8 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
9 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
10 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -60 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |