Bearfax
Grizzly old fart
Comparing DCE with Luai, based on the SOOs and the Penrith -Manly games is somewhat unfair. How well did Luai play in the SOO.? Nothing worthwhile talking about. But then he was in a side down a player and in a side being thumped. Not his fault. If the team as a whole cant meet the challenge for whatever reason, naturally the perceived performance of players is down in that side.
Now go to the Penrith-Manly match. Penrith are Premiers and a well balanced and structured side. Players in that side are going to tend to look better than their respective opposites because they have the backing of a better functioning side. Same with any player. DCE was not as impressive in this game (though note that on this site many still gave him points in the 3,2,1 assessments), but is that so surprising when your team is missing 59 tackles, 18 ineffective tackles. If you're playing with the best side, you shine brighter.
As for other half backs getting over DCE, that's conjectural based on how you personally read the game. Halves dont vie against other halves. They are there to set their teams play and what I personally see of DCE is he does that effectively. Now that's an opinion, but its one shared by the recognised experts in the game, otherwise why is he SOO Qld captain and regularly the test half.
Manly dont look like they are functioning like a well oiled team, I agree. But how is that DCE's fault? Yes he is captain and a good one who is prepared, as he did with Schuster, to lay the cards on the table. Leaders cant always seem to be good guys. Ruthless decisions have to be made. Jake is a lovely soul and yes he talks to the players and inspires by his personal performances. But leaders cant always be good guys. They are captains to maintain authority, to stand up for the players but also let them know when they aren't pulling their weight. Rugby League is a business, and hard decisions sometimes have to be made. I'm not sure Jake can do that. Could be wrong, and would love to be proved wrong, but nice guys are great as buddies and friends, but that step up to leadership requires a degree of ruthlessness on occasions
Now go to the Penrith-Manly match. Penrith are Premiers and a well balanced and structured side. Players in that side are going to tend to look better than their respective opposites because they have the backing of a better functioning side. Same with any player. DCE was not as impressive in this game (though note that on this site many still gave him points in the 3,2,1 assessments), but is that so surprising when your team is missing 59 tackles, 18 ineffective tackles. If you're playing with the best side, you shine brighter.
As for other half backs getting over DCE, that's conjectural based on how you personally read the game. Halves dont vie against other halves. They are there to set their teams play and what I personally see of DCE is he does that effectively. Now that's an opinion, but its one shared by the recognised experts in the game, otherwise why is he SOO Qld captain and regularly the test half.
Manly dont look like they are functioning like a well oiled team, I agree. But how is that DCE's fault? Yes he is captain and a good one who is prepared, as he did with Schuster, to lay the cards on the table. Leaders cant always seem to be good guys. Ruthless decisions have to be made. Jake is a lovely soul and yes he talks to the players and inspires by his personal performances. But leaders cant always be good guys. They are captains to maintain authority, to stand up for the players but also let them know when they aren't pulling their weight. Rugby League is a business, and hard decisions sometimes have to be made. I'm not sure Jake can do that. Could be wrong, and would love to be proved wrong, but nice guys are great as buddies and friends, but that step up to leadership requires a degree of ruthlessness on occasions