That's not going to happen, sorry Bozo. I just don't appreciate Penn misleading people. Yes, he may have put in X amount of money, but when you look at capital appreciation on sold assets, rent from the leagues club, gate takings, merchandise other revenues, he's well and truly in front (astronomically) .
But he's a smart business man I hear you continue to say? That may be true, but if he repaid liabilities in the clubs balance sheet (short and long term), instead of retaining all the profits as a group (and crying "I've put SO much into the club") we'd be in a much safer, more secure, more financially sound position.
Also take into consideration the loss offsets (tax benefits) he'd be claiming on top of everything else. He's gouged the club dry, while not reducing current and/or non current liabilities.
Now, if you're so pro Sea Eagles like you claim, you have to look at this in perspective like you ask everyone else to do. To confirm our position (remembering Penn both declined a buyout which would payout liability, and that he is pocketing revenue):
The Sydney-based NRL clubs lost about $12 million between them in their last available annual reports.
www.smh.com.au
Manly only have one of those to fall back on.
Whether they survive will all but certainly depend on whether the Penns - who have tipped in about $1 million per year since they took over the club to keep it afloat - see the value in propping up the Sea Eagles during what could be their darkest hour.
Manly's 2018 financial accounts revealed the club's dire overall position, which was summarised as ‘‘the company has a deficiency of funds whereby its liabilities exceed its assets by $12.48m’’. It has yet to lodge its 2019 figures.
If you're looking objectively, I think you'll finally agree Penn has done jack ****, but profiteer from us financially as well as media awareness (we've given him notoriety and credibility which isn't measured monetarily). He's sucked us dry good and well, and you're thanking him, and celebrating him for it.