Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Chad could be gone!

byso

First Grader
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
141
ADAM LUCIUS
10jun05

EMOTION will play no part in the Sea Eagles' decision over the future of hooker Chad Randall.

The 24-year-old rake is set to go on the open market unless Manly come up with an offer by the end of the month.

A new deal seems increasingly unlikely, leaving Randall no choice but to sever his family's 35-year association with the club.

Randall's father Terry is one of the Sea Eagles' all-time greats, but sentiment will play no part in contract talks.

``We are sensitive to a range of factors and one of those is he is the son of a famous player,'' Manly CEO Pat Wilson said yesterday.

``But what we've got to do is make the best decision for the sake of the organisation.

``We've got challenges in regard to the salary cap and we've got to prioritise players with the skills we require.

``We will continue to review and assess our options.''

Randall has struggled for game time behind Shayne Dunley this year, giving him little chance to impress.

But he remains hopeful Manly will not terminate his career at Brookvale.

`I'm trying not to think about the future too much because if I do I won't get much sleep,'' Randall said last night.

``If it goes another couple of weeks then I'll be getting really concerned.

``But I'm confident something will come up - if not at Manly then somewhere else.''

Rejuvenated Manly second-rower Steve Menzies hasn't ruled out playing beyond 2006.

Menzies, the leading try-scoring forward in the history of the game, is off contract at the end of next season.

After a half a season of rich form culminating in his selection in the NSW side for Origin II, the 31-year-old is enjoying a new lease of life.

``I feel fine now and I'm enjoying playing. I'll get to next year and see how I go through pre-season,'' he said.

``I don't feel too slow or too unfit.''
 

ads

Bencher
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
1,633
Reaction score
29
I feel sorry for the bloke, but I dont think he is good enough to keep. (Randall that is not Menzies)
 

PEPSI

Bencher
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
2,578
Reaction score
2
I feel sorry for the bloke, but I dont think he is good enough to keep. (Randall that is not Menzies)


lol, i think we may have picked that !
 

byso

First Grader
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
141
Same here, but Dunley really is showing him up.
 

Canteen Worker

First Grader
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,239
Reaction score
214
This matter is all about Chad's upgraded contract in 2003. Going on the open market to test is code for - the club won't pay me what I reckon I am worth so I will see if anyone else will!

He is probably on quite big money and the club does not want to keep paying him at that level. There could be a place for him should he be prepared to accept less - it will depend on what other clubs are willing to offer.
 

Duff

Bencher
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
3,345
Reaction score
619
They should put him on an incentive scheme. He has the talent, he just doesn't want to show it. If he doesn't like it he has to realise that he is, on form, the most expendable member of our top twenty players.
 

Fluffy

Journey Man
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,163
Reaction score
7,854
well monas is on 240K and chad would say he is twice as good looking - so deserves 480K
 

Ryan

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
19,779
Reaction score
18,256
We should sign him for $10.00 per year. As long as us fans get two free games, shoe hire, hot dog, fries & a coke!!!!
 

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
17 15 2 434 32
17 15 2 326 32
17 14 3 157 30
18 13 5 217 28
17 11 6 98 24
17 10 7 131 22
17 8 9 -24 18
18 8 10 -72 18
17 7 10 -60 16
17 7 10 -137 16
17 6 11 -74 14
17 6 11 -130 14
17 6 11 -203 14
17 5 12 -93 12
17 4 13 -260 10
17 2 15 -310 6
Top Bottom