Byso - please explain?

Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by Matabele, Feb 7, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. Matabele

    By:MatabeleFeb 7, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    [b:47d9b4f3fa]Byso, given how wonderful the economic management of the Howard government is, and given the ran a scare campaign over this at the last election, would you care to explain the following please?[/b:47d9b4f3fa]

    STATEMENT ON MONETARY POLICY
    February 2005
    The material in this Statement on Monetary Policy was finalised on 3 February 2005.

    On balance, the Board decided at its February meeting to leave interest rates unchanged, [color=red:47d9b4f3fa][size=18:47d9b4f3fa][b:47d9b4f3fa]while noting that the likelihood of further monetary tightening being required in the months ahead had increased[/b:47d9b4f3fa][/size:47d9b4f3fa][/color:47d9b4f3fa]. The Board will continue to monitor developments over coming months and will respond as necessary to ensure that rising inflation does not jeopardise the sustainable expansion of the Australian economy.
     
  2. Fluffy

    By:FluffyFeb 7, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,949 /271
    Simple

    It was a scare tactic that fooled the average australian.
     
  3. Matabele

    By:MatabeleFeb 7, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Is that an indictment on the average Australian.

    The Liberal Party

    OR both?
     
  4. Stevie

    By:StevieFeb 7, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    913
    Likes Received:
    58
    Likes Given:
    13
    Ratings:
    +96 /0
    Oh Oh Byso Looks Like the Plasma may have to Go Back :lol: :lol:
     
  5. fLIP

    By:fLIPFeb 7, 2005
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    551
    Likes Given:
    158
    Ratings:
    +2,612 /66
    Lucky labour didn't get in. They'd be 18% by now :roll: :p
     
  6. byso

    By:bysoFeb 7, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Are you kidding me Mata I'm sure you expected them to go up far sooner than they have.

    Also they've been sprouting increase for the last 3 months..........Nada.

    It's simply scare tactics to slow the market....imo.

    But if they do go up. It's expected.


    Interest rates WILL increase they've been to LOW for too LONG. But I will enjoy reading your sprouting every time there’s TALK of them going up :wink:

    Six. Plasmas still looking good.....NO interest over 4 years. :wink:
     
  7. Fluffy

    By:FluffyFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,949 /271
    Interesting - so you think howard is a liar byso??
     
  8. fLIP

    By:fLIPFeb 8, 2005
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,375
    Likes Received:
    551
    Likes Given:
    158
    Ratings:
    +2,612 /66
    No, howards no more a lyer than any polly. Im sure even after the rise we can still consider the rates low compared to the late 80's early 90's.
     
  9. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerFeb 8, 2005
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    I think it strange that the Reserve Bank states that high raw material prices, the capacity constraints in some sectors and higher employment costs will put pressure on inflation and then implied that higher interest rates may be justified. It strikes me that business doesn't need a double whammy of increased costs generally AND higher rates.

    Higher rates have been pushed by the treasurer over the so called fear factor of housing prices being too high. There was a slight increase in November but in general loans for new construction are down. The results from building companies are coming through now and they are disappointing. If I were an investor I do not think that housing prices have risen too greatly. The old standard was that the value of today's money would be half in seven years (or in reverse - today's money buys half of what it did 7 years ago), so by my reckoning and taking in to account the billions spent on home renovations house prices are just keeping pace, and since the slowing are falling behind. I just can't see how a rates increase is required. We are still way above all our trading partners.

    On the subject of industrial relations I think we are all in for a shock come July 1 when the Libs control the Senate. On one hand Howard and Costello pushed for separately negotiated contracts (and therefore fragmenting any bargaining position) and are now pushing for universal agreements across Australia. I will say I think that is a good move. It is crazy for a business to have different awards for staff doing the same job in different States.
     
  10. byso

    By:bysoFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    You funny fellow.

    He never said they wouldn't go up. Just that Labor wouldn't manage them as well as the libs.

    I say thats true considering they ALP cant manage themselves.... atm!
     
  11. Fluffy

    By:FluffyFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,949 /271
    He never said no gst as well i guess???
     
  12. byso

    By:bysoFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    He went into an election saying yes to GST and we voted him in :wink:

    See fluffy you've gotta try harder :lol:
     
  13. Fluffy

    By:FluffyFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,949 /271
    But i wasnt talking about the election that he polled less than labor on primary votes - i was talking about when he said there was no way he would go for a GST.
     
  14. Hopium

    By:HopiumFeb 8, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    The increase would happen. No matter WHO is in.

    An increase occurs because of reforms put in around 8 years before hand. So when you see the rate rise of 17%, one must remember that it is a long-term result of the reforms of the Libs that was put in. Also with that in mind, although the interest rate was at 17%, house prices were VERY low... now the interest rate is low, house proces are astronomical! So it all evens out in the end.

    Libs are now acknowledging that there will be a rate rise (due to the large amount of debt and the growing world economies). They want to install industrial reforms. They do not have the power to do so. The states have. And they will not relinquish their power, that is guaranteed. So the Libs are screwed.

    And what would those reforms have been? Lowering wages and booting out unions of course! So, if any one of you have jobs with companies that aren't unique or require tough degrees or have pleanty of people wanting that job, pray that the Libs don't get their grubby hands on industrial law.
     
  15. Hopium

    By:HopiumFeb 8, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    When Keating wanted the GST, Howard went against it saying he would NEVER support the GST...

    Then he goes and does it anyways...

    LIAR
     
  16. byso

    By:bysoFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Didums get over it. We all voted him in knowing it was coming. That is no Lie 8) :shock:
     
  17. Fluffy

    By:FluffyFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,557
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,949 /271
    You havnt answered my question - do you think howard is a liar??
     
  18. Hopium

    By:HopiumFeb 8, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Not all knew it was coming... in fact very few did... the ads were VERY misleading...

    I suggest you get over the Libs... They really will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes (LOL)... well, when the rates rise anyways...
     
  19. byso

    By:bysoFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    NO I dont!

    The election was based on the GST which was won.

    So what about what he said 4 or so years prior.
     
  20. byso

    By:bysoFeb 8, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    101
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Not on this issue any how!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top