lovefooty said:
Daniel said:
What has piqued your paranoia?
The scare tactics finally getting to you?
Do you think a sole owner will change anything. All it means is that they will do the best for the business and ensure it is an asset.
That includes not alienating fans, it is after all the fans and sponsors who fund a large part of the business.
Don't believe the crap, sole ownership is not the new communism
So they then take games away (no one to stop them).lose all the history and make decisions on a strict commercial basis like Searle and the place folds. Not smart to have all your eggs in one basket
Why would they do that?
Do you want to love the club to death?
If they alienate fans and therefore lose their dollars, both in gate takings, sponsorship, membership and merch, you think they would still do the same.
They need the fans onside.
By the way, sole ownership won't make this a reality, it can just as easily happen with dual owners. The deciding vote sits with the FC so it doesn't matter who owns the club.
Stop eating the bs sandwiches that people are trying to feed you