Canteen Worker
First Grader
I think we agree on much of this Candy.Thanks for your reply Canteen Worker. I'll add that there is little difference between calling an employee of the club incompetent (an opinion - also hard to justify and possibly libellous) and calling a player incompetent (an opinion - also hard to justify and possibly libellous).
But there is a world of difference between:
a) pointing out a player's defensive deficiencies, or high error rate, calling for him to be dropped and replaced by a better player, etc (legitimate, constructive criticism) and
b) labelling a player \"incompetent\", \"a fool\", \"lazy\", etc, etc. (an unconstructive whinge in the form of an unsupported personal attack)
Some of the recent global generalisations in the posts on the ME website (although I see it is no longer called the \"mightyeagles\" website) were offensive and libellous. Reading current postings on this site, the tone seems superior and criticisms generally seem better supported, specific and constructive. And any abuse generally seems to be more light-hearted banter between posters than serious attacks against a person who is not there to defend himself.
If this is the case, then your site somehow is doing a lot better than the official club site at managing negativity and inappropriate postings.
Hard to compare AE with Manlyseaeagles.com (as you correctly point out). This site is independent and the official site is owned and operated by the club and therefore has constraints on it that this site doesn't have, including being officially connected with the Manly brand, its sponsors and its reputation. It has to becarefully monitored and it seems as if it is.