Grounding of the ball can be done with any front part of the upper torso from waist to neck,which means the back of the hand is sufficeNow I think about it, why was Woods' try dissallowed? If you are grounding the ball with the back of your hand in action to score, that would not be allowed. But if you're grounding the ball in the action to force a dropout it counts??? How does that make sense??
No sense at all. His hand was brushing the ball after he missed the pick up a rubbish call. Bellamy accepts the score flattered Melbourne.Now I think about it, why was Woods' try dissallowed? If you are grounding the ball with the back of your hand in action to score, that would not be allowed. But if you're grounding the ball in the action to force a dropout it counts??? How does that make sense??
View attachment 23606 Once you see it , you can't un-see it!
Ball was grounded every day of the week. Even the most one eyed manly supporter could see that. Wasn’t even close imo. The strip call from Woods and Bully no try in the other hand was BS.No sense at all. His hand was brushing the ball after he missed the pick up a rubbish call. Bellamy accepts the score flattered Melbourne.
Both G.Stewart and Watmough were in the corporate areas with club lanyards,entertaining peopleJust an aside - I thought it was interesting that Woods said he had seen Watmough and Glen Stewart in the change rooms. I didn't think they (particularly Watmough) were hanging around the club coz of DCE. Am I off the mark with this history? If they are back in the fold, I think that can only be a good thing when it comes to getting thst Manly spirit back in the club.
DCE andGift we’re having a great convo in the sheds after the game (as seen on 9 coverage)Just an aside - I thought it was interesting that Woods said he had seen Watmough and Glen Stewart in the change rooms. I didn't think they (particularly Watmough) were hanging around the club coz of DCE. Am I off the mark with this history? If they are back in the fold, I think that can only be a good thing when it comes to getting thst Manly spirit back in the club.
Obviously he doesn’t dictate these transactions but the point is he didn’t come for nothing. There was a transaction. And I’m saying we may live to regret that. Regardless of any of the shenanigans you described the fact remains that we ‘swapped’ woods for this two. So YES it did ‘cost’ us two players. It’s not wood’s fault but it’s the fact. So calm down and take a chil pill sweetheart.No you’re wrong , HE didn’t do anything like that.
The youngsters were offered much more money than we could afford , they were going in 24 regardless.
St Merge wanted them early , “ ok you can have them early but we want $200k ” says Manly , “ sorry we can’t afford that but we’ll offer you a player for nothing , he’ll be on our cap not yours “.
Manly then thinks “ well that’s $200k we can use to upgrade the Big O ( who was asking for it ) and then it gives us a other spot in the 30, so rightio St Merge , we agree “.
Aaron Woods would have had no part on that other than being told he was moving.
He did NOT cost us the loss of two young players , that’s just utter bull ****.
No one is blaming him personally. But the fact is he didn’t just come to our club for nothing. He came as part of a deal. So there is a ‘cost’. In your haste to defend woods (whom I’m not attacking at all) You’re missing the point entirely.I can understand the sadness at losing two young players we’ve nurtured for years , but sadly that’s the game these days.
BUT to blame a player who was involved in a swap , and who would have had very little to do with any of it , is just a low blow !!
That's great.Both G.Stewart and Watmough were in the corporate areas with club lanyards,entertaining peopleView attachment 23610
Also great. I was at the game so I didn't see Ch 9 coverage. Does that mean there is no rift anymore? Or was that always overplayed?DCE andGift we’re having a great convo in the sheds after the game (as seen on 9 coverage)
No I’m not , you actually used the words blaming him for the loss of the two kids.No one is blaming him personally. But the fact is he didn’t just come to our club for nothing. He came as part of a deal. So there is a ‘cost’. In your haste to defend woods (whom I’m not attacking at all) You’re missing the point entirely.
Wow. So good.
Ha , sweetheart , that’s a new one !!Obviously he doesn’t dictate these transactions but the point is he didn’t come for nothing. There was a transaction. And I’m saying we may live to regret that. Regardless of any of the shenanigans you described the fact remains that we ‘swapped’ woods for this two. So YES it did ‘cost’ us two players. It’s not wood’s fault but it’s the fact. So calm down and take a chil pill sweetheart.
How can any Manly fan not get joy from him being stoked playing for us? All you grinches seriously go and get ****ed. He's costing us nothing and like us. Not directed @ markfrombrisbaneSome of you are such hard markers , first game , no pre season training , probably one training run , nervous no doubt , drops a ball ( yes an error but guess what so did our million dollar fullback ) , doesn’t perform like the top prop in the game and you want to shaft him straight way.
Most of you have pre determined he’s crap , and wouldn’t matter what he did you’d hate him.
Good on him for last night, wasn’t a 5 star performance, but he did the job he was asked to do.
Also great. I was at the game so I didn't see Ch 9 coverage. Does that mean there is no rift anymore? Or was that always overplayed?
It was a nice touch wasn’t it.How can any Manly fan not get joy from him being stoked playing for us? All you grinches seriously go and get ****ed. He's costing us nothing and like us. Not directed @ markfrombrisbane
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |