I hear what you are saying, but the Penns became sole owners knowing full well the current state of affairs with respect to the Football Club, the preference share, and the state of Brookvale Oval. No point THEM bitching and moaning and sooking when they cop backlash about trying to take games away from Brookie. And where is their clear and well communicated plan for the future ? If they have one let's here it and debate the relative merits of it.
All I've seen is propaganda in the DT about the financial impracticality of Brookie as a venue and a written request to the FC to reduce the minimum number of games at Brookvale AND change the constitutional status of the preference share in this respect. How many games ? where to ? for how long ? Do you know the answers to these questions Loobs ?? I don't.
All the FC club did was respond to the request in a manner that I, as a member, am fully in agreeance with and frankly I'd be disappointed if that wasn't the response. How stupid are they if they think that they are just going to give an open ended agreement to play games wherever they like and for however long they like. If they are trying to bluff the council here than don't use the FC as your pawn. You keep saying that others should come up with a plan or a solution, but where is the MWSE plan ?? If they have one let's see it and talk about it, if it is viable everyone will work with them to achieve what we all want - a successful team playing at Brookvale Oval.
I don't think most people are necessarily anti-Penn, I'm not. I'm happy they are stumping up their cash and keeping my team alive, and I understand that gives them certain rights. But how about a bit of communication and engagement with the supporter base and the membership. Let us know what you are trying to achieve and we'll get on board if it is a workable solution.