Brissie Kid said:Stevo said:This is a stupid arguement. Why should he go under the cap if he doesn't play? So what if he puts their jersey on?
Hoppa does have a contract in place now to play for the Eels. He is now appearing in Eels jersey.
It's no different to paying a player peanuts and then paying him a truckload after retiring. The NRL wouldn't let that pass. They would put all the money under the club's cap.
Stevo said:If Paul Vautin is being payed to spruik our brand, should it come under our salary cap?
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 21 | 17 | 0 | 4 | 168 | 40 |
2 | Storm | 21 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 252 | 38 |
3 | Bulldogs | 21 | 15 | 0 | 6 | 120 | 36 |
4 | Warriors | 21 | 13 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
5 | Panthers | 21 | 12 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 31 |
6 | Broncos | 21 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 114 | 30 |
7 | Sharks | 22 | 13 | 0 | 9 | 67 | 30 |
8 | Roosters | 21 | 11 | 0 | 10 | 92 | 28 |
9 | Dolphins | 21 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 109 | 26 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | -24 | 24 |
11 | Tigers | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | -107 | 24 |
12 | Dragons | 21 | 8 | 0 | 13 | -54 | 22 |
13 | Cowboys | 22 | 8 | 1 | 13 | -144 | 21 |
14 | Eels | 21 | 7 | 0 | 14 | -156 | 20 |
15 | Rabbitohs | 22 | 8 | 0 | 14 | -191 | 20 |
16 | Knights | 21 | 6 | 0 | 15 | -186 | 18 |
17 | Titans | 21 | 5 | 0 | 16 | -187 | 16 |