Brissie Kid said:Stevo said:This is a stupid arguement. Why should he go under the cap if he doesn't play? So what if he puts their jersey on?
Hoppa does have a contract in place now to play for the Eels. He is now appearing in Eels jersey.
It's no different to paying a player peanuts and then paying him a truckload after retiring. The NRL wouldn't let that pass. They would put all the money under the club's cap.
Stevo said:If Paul Vautin is being payed to spruik our brand, should it come under our salary cap?
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 3 | 0 | 48 | 6 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 45 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 4 | |
2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | |
2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 4 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -5 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -15 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -22 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -36 | 2 | |
2 | 0 | 2 | -56 | 2 | |
3 | 0 | 3 | -64 | 0 |