Brissie Kid said:Stevo said:This is a stupid arguement. Why should he go under the cap if he doesn't play? So what if he puts their jersey on?
Hoppa does have a contract in place now to play for the Eels. He is now appearing in Eels jersey.
It's no different to paying a player peanuts and then paying him a truckload after retiring. The NRL wouldn't let that pass. They would put all the money under the club's cap.
Stevo said:If Paul Vautin is being payed to spruik our brand, should it come under our salary cap?
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 17 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 108 | 30 |
2 | Storm | 15 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 202 | 28 |
3 | Bulldogs | 15 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 92 | 28 |
4 | Warriors | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 26 |
5 | Broncos | 16 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 68 | 22 |
6 | Panthers | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 21 |
7 | Dolphins | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 162 | 20 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 58 | 20 |
9 | Roosters | 15 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 20 |
10 | Sharks | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | -4 | 20 |
11 | Dragons | 15 | 6 | 0 | 9 | -49 | 18 |
12 | Cowboys | 16 | 6 | 1 | 9 | -140 | 17 |
13 | Knights | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -67 | 16 |
14 | Tigers | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -82 | 16 |
15 | Eels | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -103 | 16 |
16 | Rabbitohs | 17 | 6 | 0 | 11 | -129 | 14 |
17 | Titans | 15 | 4 | 0 | 11 | -144 | 14 |