The difference is that last year, Api wasn't stinking up the joint when he was out there, he was doing a good job, especially defensively. Yes our attack got better once Fainu would come on to replace him, but we rarely were down by 12-18 points when Fainu did come on. With Levi out there we aren't scoring points (which is even worse now that our two main strike players in Turbo and Walker are on the sidelines) and we are going down by 2-3-4 tries by the time he's replaced.
I hope Levi does have a big game today against the Knights, I really do because he needs to start to repay the faith we showed in him to pick him up when Newcastle let him go (although lets be honest, after releasing Api and then Fainu getting into legal trouble, we had to get a hooker some somewhere). But TBH, I really can see just why they were fully prepared to let Levi go and why he didn't get much of a run with them.
I know Levi is a Kiwi test hooker, but look at it in context. For mine he is just one in the long list of players throughout the games history who have been picked in rep sides, even test teams, simply because in the position they played they were last man standing. The reality is that if others were available at the time, Levi would never get near a test jumper. Hell, if he was from NSW and the game was still played he would never get near the City vs Country game, let alone test football.