Watmough facing two match ban
- Thread starter WAMF
- Start date
I can see him getting this downgraded. How was he to know that a player on was holding the legs, he was trying to force the player onto his back and had a right to do so given the position that he was in from the start of the tackle, it did end up in a bad way for Lock, but it certainly wasn't Grade 2. I think he can get it downgraded to a grade 1, if he had pleaded not guilty there is a chance that he could have got it wiped out but I think the pleading guilty was the right move as there was obviously some resulting dangerous contact
I can see him getting this downgraded. How was he to know that a player on was holding the legs, he was trying to force the player onto his back and had a right to do so given the position that he was in from the start of the tackle, it did end up in a bad way for Lock, but it certainly wasn't Grade 2. I think he can get it downgraded to a grade 1, if he had pleaded not guilty there is a chance that he could have got it wiped out but I think the pleading guilty was the right move as there was obviously some resulting dangerous contact
Users who are viewing this thread
2025 Ladder
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 26 |
| 2 | Raiders | 14 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 96 | 24 |
| 3 | Warriors | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 35 | 24 |
| 4 | Storm | 12 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 171 | 22 |
| 5 | Sharks | 14 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 26 | 18 |
| 6 | Dolphins | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 146 | 16 |
| 7 | Broncos | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 16 |
| 8 | Roosters | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | -18 | 16 |
| 9 | Panthers | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -9 | 15 |
| 10 | Cowboys | 13 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -106 | 15 |
| 11 | Sea Eagles | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 14 |
| 12 | Dragons | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -59 | 14 |
| 13 | Tigers | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -62 | 14 |
| 14 | Rabbitohs | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | -88 | 14 |
| 15 | Knights | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | -69 | 12 |
| 16 | Eels | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -105 | 12 |
| 17 | Titans | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | -122 | 12 |
