Watmough facing two match ban
- Thread starter WAMF
- Start date
I can see him getting this downgraded. How was he to know that a player on was holding the legs, he was trying to force the player onto his back and had a right to do so given the position that he was in from the start of the tackle, it did end up in a bad way for Lock, but it certainly wasn't Grade 2. I think he can get it downgraded to a grade 1, if he had pleaded not guilty there is a chance that he could have got it wiped out but I think the pleading guilty was the right move as there was obviously some resulting dangerous contact
I can see him getting this downgraded. How was he to know that a player on was holding the legs, he was trying to force the player onto his back and had a right to do so given the position that he was in from the start of the tackle, it did end up in a bad way for Lock, but it certainly wasn't Grade 2. I think he can get it downgraded to a grade 1, if he had pleaded not guilty there is a chance that he could have got it wiped out but I think the pleading guilty was the right move as there was obviously some resulting dangerous contact
Users who are viewing this thread
2020 Ladder
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
| 2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
| 3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
| 4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
| 5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
| 6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
| 7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
| 8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
| 9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
| 10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
| 11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
| 12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
| 13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
| 14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
| 15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
| 16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
| 17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |
