1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Was gallop a witness

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by jbb/james, Oct 1, 2010.

  1. jbb/james

    jbb/james Well-Known Member Premium Member

    +1,497 /35
    Surely if the NRL had enough information and evidence to suspend brett for 4 weeks, fine the manly club, they did so on factual information. And if so I wonder why he wasnt called as a witness
    You Know why

    He had nothing, he's got nothing and there was nothing. but still the penalties are imposed. And still after his innocence is proven Nothing

    Maybe his fact was based on Paul kent and Rebecca wilson's stories after all that all they were stories
  2. Rusty

    Rusty Well-Known Member

    +45 /0
    He wasn't called as a witness, as the prosecution knew he knew nothing and would collapse under the pressure of a cross and because the defense wouldn't want to introduce to the jury someone who so clearly prejudged the situation, in case he came out and said that in his opinion Brett was clearly guilty. (Or based on evidence at the time... etc)
  3. ManlyBacker

    ManlyBacker Winging it Staff Member

    +972 /7
    I can only offer up a general warning - just be careful folks about leaving yourself open. You are responsible for what appears in a forum like this. I am not saying there is anything wrong with any posts put through so far but keep your wits about you. Cheers.

Share This Page