Victor the inflictor

[Stewbojevic]

Surely, someone from the bunker has to be held accountable for missing this. Imagine if it happened to one of their players how much Robbo would have to say about it at the press conference.

He wasn’t charged today either… who can explain that?

 

[Cliffymagic]

It's too late now but did Keppie even tell the ref.
Would have ended up 70 to 6 if he got sent.

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

In slow motion

https://twitter.com/x/status/1439060491272216576

@The better Robbo this one

 

[The better Robbo]

@The better Robbo this one

I'm on it

 

[XV-1]

He wasn’t charged today either… who can explain that?

The penalty and sin bin was sufficient

 

[QLDSeaeagle]

Does he actually punch him??

Itsa a Pansy punch at best, that will get squared up next season, " a punch to the head, should not be aimed at the contact point, but at an imaginary point six inches through it." When this happens to Victor the Grub, he will give up his hardman(with a special small h) persona

 

[QLDSeaeagle]

but did Keppie even tell the ref.

There was some chat at the scrum between Shawn and the Ref.

 

[Sea Eagle 4 Life]

Gets away with murder:

How NRL star got away with murder

Sydney Roosters firebrand Victor Radley has escaped the ire of the match review committee, despite appearing to punch an opposition player during Friday night’s game.

www.news.com.au

 

[40 years an eagle]

There was some chat at the scrum between Shawn and the Ref.

That was the ref telling Kelpie that he can't hold on to his opposing prop after the ball comes out I think.

 

[QLDSeaeagle]

That was the ref telling Kelpie that he can't hold on to his opposing prop after the ball comes out I think.

Maybe Keppie should have replied " I'm holding on to his punching arm"

 

[MadMarcus]

On Saturday, an NRL spokesperson told NCA NewsWire that there was not enough evidence to charge Radley with striking.

“Based on the available angles, the Bunker Review Official and the Match Review Committee were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said.

WOW

 

[QLDSeaeagle]

Based on the available angles, the Bunker Review Official and the Match Review Committee were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said.

Based on the available angles, a Blind Man and the Dementia Ward were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said.

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

On Saturday, an NRL spokesperson told NCA NewsWire that there was not enough evidence to charge Radley with striking.

“Based on the available angles, the Bunker Review Official and the Match Review Committee were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said.

WOW

Tell them to come to Silvertails and look at the tweet I shared ( in slow motion ) , pretty clear to me.

 

[StuBoot]

Why do we care, no one was hurt and didn't cost us?

 

[QLDSeaeagle]

Why do we care, no one was hurt and didn't cost us?

Because this level of absolute ****e officialdom can be repeated to our detriment in the future.

 

[The Who]

On Saturday, an NRL spokesperson told NCA NewsWire that there was not enough evidence to charge Radley with striking.

“Based on the available angles, the Bunker Review Official and the Match Review Committee were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said.

WOW

Yet the Bunker pretends it can see which way a player is looking when contesting a bomb?

 

[SeaEagle21]

Should be Victor the Pička, Jake and Tom can translate that Serbo-Croat word.

Descibes him better than inflictor and rhymes just the same.

 

[globaleagle]

If the mrc can't rule on things that aren't a penalty nor on report then I'm not going to have a go at them, even though I thought they 'reviewed' everything.

It's the ones that are looking at the footage, on the field, or sitting in the bunker, telling us there's no clear angles yet also tell us it is a slap can give themselves an uppercut.

Speaking of uppercuts...Radley threw one in there as well. Lemme guess...none of the cameras saw that either.

whether you believe in punch or no punch it was only 'geography' that apparently saved radley (that and the politics of the nrl in general).

"Reckless, careless, intent" seems to apply to other misdemeanors, but no for the one rule brought in to 'protect all the kiddies, calm down to mums, and get the tick of approval from daughters touch footy teams.'

It's a b/s ruling or non ruling.

 

[Cameron]

In slow motion

https://twitter.com/x/status/1439060491272216576

Victor Creagh the cat

 

[Captain Moondog]

“Based on the available angles, the Bunker Review Official and the Match Review Committee were unable to determine if a punch was involved,” a spokesperson said."

It's a lot clearer if you pull your head out of your arse.