Van Nguyen

[Matabele]

You try to convince people like Mata that his depression isn't caused by drugs. Same story from Garts.

The arm chair expert!!!

 

[Dan]

Publish what you like, I'm sure this proves what levels you would go to to \"prove a point\"

That's a good way to win the trust of your patrons!

I didn't know that you keep dirt on everyone champ. Tell us more of what you have on other for us in ST!

Champ all I am saying is that you may have been "baiting" but you came across as an idiot, that was supported by quite a few PM's

 

[Dan]

I could not sleep last night so flicked on the tv to find a re run of the Osbournes. If ever someone wants to know how drugs can effect you look at Ossie. I forgot how funny that guy is :lol: :lol: Should not laugh but I cant help it, he cracks me up.

Yes substance abuse in copius amount are never going to be good for you.

Remember he was an alcoholic, Harry addict (and I dont mean potter) and put every other kind of drug you can imagine through his body several times a day.

his shakes more than likely come from the alcohol though. Ever seen "leaving las vegas"?

 

[Dan]

[quote author=byso]
You try to convince people like Mata that his depression isn't caused by drugs. Same story from Garts.

The arm chair expert!!!

[/quote]


I tried to convince him of nothing, I asked for proof, of which none was presented!

I am definately no expert but I read enough of the medical findings on it to know there is no conclusive evidence yet!

 

[clontaago]

ooh watch out Fonz you might get accused of sucking up

 

[Matabele]

There's no conclusive evidence that it doesn't.

touche.

 

[Dan]

There's no conclusive evidence that it doesn't.

touche.

correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.

The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!

 

[byso]

I may look stupid to the loonies.

But I have no concern to impress them!

 

[Matabele]

[quote author=Matabele]
There's no conclusive evidence that it doesn't.

touche.

correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.

The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]

No - your pre-supposition is that the onus of proof is not on you.

My pre-supposition is the opposite.

Whose pre-supposition is correct?

Byso - I suggest Dan is arguing from his own personal experience which is a fairly small minded and narrow view - regardless of how many countries have been graced with his presence.

Suggest you just treat it with the contempt it deserves.

 

[Utility Player]

[quote author=Matabele]
There's no conclusive evidence that it doesn't.

touche.

correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.

The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]


This is getting to sound a bit like another thread on this page hope it has the legs of the original :lol:

 

[Matabele]

Exactly UP.

 

[Dan]

[quote author=Daniel]
[quote author=Matabele]
There's no conclusive evidence that it doesn't.

touche.

correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.

The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]

No - your pre-supposition is that the onus of proof is not on you.

My pre-supposition is the opposite.

Whose pre-supposition is correct?

Byso - I suggest Dan is arguing from his own personal experience which is a fairly small minded and narrow view - regardless of how many countries have been graced with his presence.

Suggest you just treat it with the contempt it deserves.
[/quote]




lol if you are debating from your own personal view then your argument is as equally narrow minded.

 

[Matabele]

No I'm debating the opinion of an expert in the field who has thoroughly reviewed my case over a period of some years.

Do you know what a PhD is?

If Byso is an idiot (or whatever else it is you're calling him) then you're an arrogant young twat who has a lot to learn in life.

 

[Dan]

I am arrogant and young yes. If you didnt already know that, I am unsure where you have been reading.

If you are debating the view of another, it is still just hearsay evidence!

 

[Matabele]

*ponders how much medical evidence to actually give out*

 

[Dan]

none on yourself. But if you have studies I would be ahppy to read them and be proven wrong. That is fine, but from the research i have done i can not find anything that would convince me of the link.

There is a lot of tabloid medicine out there fuelled by trash like ACA and the Telegraph

 

[Matabele]

galvanise

 

[Dan]

lol...

agree to disagree?

You and I are too proud and arrogant to ever see eye to eye on something and once again, our pre-suppositions are getting in the way

 

[Fro]

Note to self.

Add Drugs to list of topics to steer clear of.

1) Religion
2) Politics
3) Dans Ego 😉
4) Religion
and now
5) Drugs

 

[Dan]

🙂