AndWeDon'tCare
Reserve Grader
Are the clauses tied to the number of games Tom plays each year ?
I would love to answer this but best I don't at this time.
In my opinion, the deal is a good deal for both sides.
Are the clauses tied to the number of games Tom plays each year ?
I’m honestly flabbergasted that some around here are happy to give Tom an open cheque and name his amount. The real reason we have been **** for all these years is because we have had big money tied up to 3 players, being Tom, Jake and DCE.
If we want any future success we have to make the hard calls and only offer so much to players who don’t deliver or are constantly injured. The club and administration are finally making the smart business decisions in re-structuring our cap and some people still have no idea. Then they’ll complain and bag a player that is on 250k for not delivering, but Tom and Jake are immune to the criticism because they are ‘local juniors’.
Maybe upgrade Lehi, Koula & add another reasonable forward?Ok lets (hypothetical) sack him - remembering you have to spend the entire salary cap and only have 30 players to spend it on.
Who are we getting to take his place and use the entire $750k-$900K.
Some options are
Jareame Bulla
James Tedesco
Will Kennedy
AJ Brimson
Scott Drinkwater.
Isaiah Iongi
Presuming Latreen, Ponga, Walsh, Edwards and Pappy are out of our price range.
That would make so much sense. Which means it's likely we haven't done that.Are the clauses tied to the number of games Tom plays each year ?
Ok lets (hypothetical) sack him - remembering you have to spend the entire salary cap and only have 30 players to spend it on.
Who are we getting to take his place and use the entire $750k-$900K.
Some options are
Jareame Bulla
James Tedesco
Will Kennedy
AJ Brimson
Scott Drinkwater.
Isaiah Iongi
Presuming Latreen, Ponga, Walsh, Edwards and Pappy are out of our price range.
And ends in IS.and the common denominator with all of that is ,,,,,,,,,,?
Ill give you a hint ,has a peaches and cream complexion, sometimes goes by the name Mr Fluffy ,has a very sore anus from the sliver spoon that has been firmly implanted since birth ,surname begins with P.
As an aside…..there is a rumour floating about that the club will be up for sale soon??? &WDC do you know anything?
I’d guess George Peponis but his complexion is more olive than peaches and cream.And ends in IS.
It was a figure of speech.Can you please quote the posts where anyone has said they are 'happy to give Tom an open cheque and to name his amount'.
I've obviously missed some posts.
You sound a bit like my accountant. He’s always saying things like your Net Tangible Assets are worryingly intangible, and your EBITDA is in the TOILET. Still, he did advise me to leave a goodwill, so I’ve left the bulk of my estate to the canteen under the Lyons Menzies stand so they can invest in a new pie warmer. Hopefully that will escape the attention of the salary cap auditor.There have been 2 approaches this year, both of which did not progress very far.
To be be fair to the Penn family (and I'm one of their biggest critics) they considered each one however they didn't warrant any further consideration.
There is no direct "for sale" sign on the "front door" however, it is becoming apparent that if the right value was offered AND commercial terms regarding the settlement of that value were reached, there would be interest.
If I were a betting man, the Penn family would be best to wait until the next T.V rights deal, as the intangible & unrealised gain that would be generated from the revaluation of the "Manly brand" and [the] fact that they hold a valid participation and license agreement, would boost their "bottom line" as the expected increase in T.V revenue, would flow right into a will established and functional business model.
That bottom line and the resulting increase in the EBITDA (accepting that a % of the expected increase in the grant from the NRL is conditional on going to the players) would provide them (Penn family) with an uplift in the earnings multiple and they would seek to capitalise on that position by the increasing the overall sale price by also increasing the value of the intangibles and goodwill of the Club.
I hope this makes sense.
In short, if I were to advise them, I'd wait until the new T.V. deal, grab the extra cash from the NRL, bank it into my own bank account, boost the bottom line then sell the Club.
You sound a bit like my accountant. He’s always saying things like your Net Tangible Assets are worryingly intangible, and your EBITDA is in the TOILET. Still, he did advise me to leave a goodwill, so I’ve left the bulk of my estate to the canteen under the Lyons Menzies stand so they can invest in a new pie warmer. Hopefully that will escape the attention of the salary cap auditor.
There have been 2 approaches this year, both of which did not progress very far.
To be be fair to the Penn family (and I'm one of their biggest critics) they considered each one however they didn't warrant any further consideration.
There is no direct "for sale" sign on the "front door" however, it is becoming apparent that if the right value was offered AND commercial terms regarding the settlement of that value were reached, there would be interest.
If I were a betting man, the Penn family would be best to wait until the next T.V rights deal, as the intangible & unrealised gain that would be generated from the revaluation of the "Manly brand" and [the] fact that they hold a valid participation and license agreement, would boost their "bottom line" as the expected increase in T.V revenue, would flow right into a will established and functional business model.
That bottom line and the resulting increase in the EBITDA (accepting that a % of the expected increase in the grant from the NRL is conditional on going to the players) would provide them (Penn family) with an uplift in the earnings multiple and they would seek to capitalise on that position by the increasing the overall sale price by also increasing the value of the intangibles and goodwill of the Club.
I hope this makes sense.
In short, if I were to advise them, I'd wait until the new T.V. deal, grab the extra cash from the NRL, bank it into my own bank account, boost the bottom line then sell the Club.
Perhaps the Penns should focus on rebuilding the club and reinvigorating the Manly brand now, rather than appearing to run the club and the brand into the ground.
Surely, a revaluation of the "Manly brand" in the future would require the club to achieve some consistent success in its operations, and more importantly, results on the field. Something the club has not experienced in the Penn era, and is unlikely to experience under their ownership.
Mayo for mayos sakeIt was a figure of speech.
Exactly , we cannot afford to lose either of those 2 to keep a questionable lame duck Turbo. We've already lost too many halfbacks because of DCE.All good ideas.
But I just dont see us being stronger without Tom.
Both Lehi and Koula will test the market this time next year. The Roosters will take one of them.
2026 shapes as a massive year for the club.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |