Where's the fun in that @patorick2010 ?I'd wait until an official announcement before reacting to what's happening.
Benefit of the doubt goes both ways here.

Where's the fun in that @patorick2010 ?I'd wait until an official announcement before reacting to what's happening.
Benefit of the doubt goes both ways here.
I think it's probably more of a misdirected pile-on club management, rather than a pile-on on Tom, when it should be a pile-on on the agent and his media henchmen.People are always so quick to pile on the player these days
I've said it a few times but fandom is so toxic these days often fuelled by a 24 hours news and content cycle.
So Tom should look out for himself as should any player because the clubs will turn on you if it benefits them and certainly a large portion of fans will at the drop of a hat.
He doesnt owe the club a thing.
Indeed.I'd wait until an official announcement before reacting to what's happening.
Benefit of the doubt goes both ways here.
Doesn’t happen there because they are professionally run clubs not amateur penny pinching out fit like oursDoes this happen at the Panthers, Storm, Roosters etc.? Or are we just some poor, unfortunate victim type of club?
Im just a pie eater ,but a lot of this doesn't make a lot of sense ,Wolves offering less $ and less years ,yet its not about the money.I'm sorry but I'm over this crap Tom if you want just leave. One minute Tom is looking to hand money back (supposedly) now he wants to complain about 100k wtf
"The contract at the Wolves is worth less than the one on offer at Manly, but money is not the key driver behind Trbojevic’s decision."
Then why are you complaining if money is not the key driver?
Because we are a deeply unserious clubIm just a pie eater ,but a lot of this doesn't make a lot of sense ,Wolves offering less $ and less years ,yet its not about the money.
I smell another slimey manager playing Manly off the break here ,ala what happened with the Schu,The Fainu's etc .
I want him to stay ,but why cant we quietly just extend someone like every other bloody club does with out all our dirty laundry getting hung out to be inspected ,dissected and scrutinised by these low life alleged "journalists"
Yep, that's what I reckon too.I smell another slimey manager playing Manly off the break here ,ala what happened with the Schu,The Fainu's etc .
and the common denominator with all of that is ,,,,,,,,,,?TBaz, Keith Titmuss, rainbow-gate, Des sacking, Seibold signing, Schuster signing, Schuster sacking, Lodge signing, Lloyd Perrett, DCE circus, Daley signing, Daley rejection… that is just off the top of my head…
It ain’t Turbo’s fault that Manly look bad…
I think the 850k talked about earlier in the week suits all parties.Anything under $900k is an insult.
We only win when he plays, our entire seasons are based on the amount of games he plays.
The best Manly players in a decade.
Someone has to be our top money earner, might as well be someone who can actually play and has his heart in it.
Nope he gets injured playing for us so should accept match payments and be grateful 🤣🤣🤣Anything under $900k is an insult.
We only win when he plays, our entire seasons are based on the amount of games he plays.
The best Manly players in a decade.
Someone has to be our top money earner, might as well be someone who can actually play and has his heart in it.
Nope he gets injured playing for us so should accept match payments and be grateful 🤣🤣🤣
Can you please quote the posts where anyone has said they are 'happy to give Tom an open cheque and to name his amount'.I’m honestly flabbergasted that some around here are happy to give Tom an open cheque and name his amount. The real reason we have been **** for all these years is because we have had big money tied up to 3 players, being Tom, Jake and DCE.
If we want any future success we have to make the hard calls and only offer so much to players who don’t deliver or are constantly injured. The club and administration are finally making the smart business decisions in re-structuring our cap and some people still have no idea. Then they’ll complain and bag a player that is on 250k for not delivering, but Tom and Jake are immune to the criticism because they are ‘local juniors’.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |