Trump

[47MVEagle]

White House says Donald Trump's alleged signature on Jeffrey Epstein's birthday note to be analysed​

"Mr Trump has denied giving the former financier a letter that appears in a birthday book for Epstein with the crude sketch of a woman's body and a note about secrets."

"The White House, and Mr Trump, have both denied its authenticity.

"It's not my signature and it's not the way I speak," Trump told reporters before dining out in the US capital on Tuesday."

Imagine someone waaaaaaaaay back in 2003 forging Trump's signature in a birthday message to Epstein just so it could be used 22 YEARS LATER to link Trump to a deviant like Epstein?

Now that's some BIG BRAINED 4D CHESS SH1T!

Trump's alleged signature on Epstein birthday note to be analysed

The White House says it will support a forensic analysis of the signature on a birthday letter allegedly given by Donald Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

www.abc.net.au

 

[Ohgeez]

Yeah, I thought that myself when they referred to Trump as the...former President in the article...mmm..

Yep & now 47Eagle is trying to spam up the thread with other silly articles to try take heat of himself 🤣 I’ve caught him out multiple times in a few days in this thread now - it’s too easy

 

[Highflier]

Donald Trump found guilty on 34 charges​

"One of those negative stories was the news that Trump had engaged in sexual intercourse with the porn star Stormy Daniels. Had this information come out, Trump — a married man — would have been the center of a high-profile sex scandal in the middle of the campaign. And so Trump sought to catch and kill the story before it went public, tasking his former lawyer and all-round fixer Michael Cohen with paying Daniels USD $130,000 – a ‘hush money’ payment that would silence the story.

Though frowned upon, hush money payments are not illegal in the US. But Trump’s fatal mistake was to disguise the payment as something else. In 34 separate transactions, Trump hid evidence of the payment, separating it into parts in Cohen’s invoices to him, and in other checks, stubs and voucher entries in Trump’s business ledgers.

This action — falsifying business records — was the essence of the crime.

Generally, falsifying internal business records is just a misdemeanour offence in New York, and not even a crime at all in many other states. For the offence to constitute a felony, District Attorney Bragg had to prove that Trump falsified the business records in furtherance of committing another crime — in this case, covering up a sex scandal to improperly influence the 2016 presidential election.

The jury agreed.

Over several weeks the jury heard salacious and combative evidence about sex, politics and dodgy business dealings. According to those in the room, they were particularly attentive and focused. Then, after two days of deliberation, their verdict was unanimous: Trump was guilty of all counts."

Donald Trump found guilty on 34 charges - Law Society Journal

The former Presidentis guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records, becoming the first ever President to be convicted of a felony.

lsj.com.au

Just a fact check 47MVE the Stormy Daniels story originally came out in 2011, it was only reheated and of course turbo charged again in 2017/2018 to suit oblivious political purposes

 

[47MVEagle]

What Trump has said about Jeffrey Epstein over the years, including on 2024 campaign trail​

"2019: Trump distances himself from Epstein: 'Not a fan'
After Epstein was arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors in July 2019, Trump was asked about his 2002 comments in which he called Epstein "terrific" in a New York Magazine story.

In response, Trump repeatedly said he wasn't a "fan" of Epstein.

"Well, I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach. I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. I was not, yeah, a long time ago, I'd say maybe 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you. I was not a fan of his."

In August 2019, after Epstein's death, Trump retweeted a post that alleged Bill Clinton was connected to Epstein's death.

When asked about his retweet in an interview, Trump said "what we're saying is we want an investigation. I want a full investigation, and that's what I absolutely am demanding. That's what our attorney general -- our great attorney general -- is doing." The attorney general at the time was Bill Barr."

"2025: Trump tries to dismiss Epstein files after DOJ, FBI memo prompts GOP backlash
For the first several months of his administration, talk of the Epstein files was mostly left to Trump officials, including Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel and FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino. In April, Trump said he was unaware of when the files would be released.

Then, after the DOJ and FBI released their memo on July 7, Trump reacted to outrage from his MAGA base.

Trump tried to shut down a question about Epstein during a Cabinet meeting the next day, July 8, right after the deadly flash flooding of the Guadalupe River.

"Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?" Trump shot back to a reporter. "This guy's been talked about for years. You're asking. We have Texas, we have this. We have all of the things. And are people still talking about this guy, this creep? That is unbelievable."

Quite a turnaround in attitude towards releasing the files.

What Trump has said about Jeffrey Epstein over the years, including on 2024 campaign trail

Trump faces backlash from MAGA supporters over his admin's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Here's what he's said about the disgraced financier over the years.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Brookie1973]

gee how could I forget the autopen and the pardons, like what was I thinking ?
Again you honestly couldn't make it up ?Only in America as they say ??
I think good ole Dr Jill had all those pardons under control, especially when it came to her compromised ,corrupt , drug addled ,and whore addicted son

Yes, Dr Jill, the first female US President.

 

[Eagle 1]

Yep & now 47Eagle is trying to spam up the thread with other silly articles to try take heat of himself 🤣 I’ve caught him out multiple times in a few days in this thread now - it’s too easy

Yeah, you've really set him off, it's like a posting frenzy gone crazy.

 

[Highflier]

Yeah, you've really set him off, it's like a posting frenzy gone crazy.

Its like a Google/AI shoot out ,but his stuff is old .

 

[lsz]

100% correct Ohgeez !! .
The democrats mobilised every government instrumentality to destroy Trump and his family ,his 2016 campaign, his 1st presidency ,his 2nd Presidential campaign and there still trying in his 2nd Presidency .
They used the FBI ,IRS, the Courts ( his 34 book keeping felonies ), the media and all the leftard commentators, the Joy Reid's, Rachel Maddens etc ,the big tech titans etc to absolutely flay him .
Do you think for one minute that if there was a scintilla ,nay a shred of evidence on the Epstein files negative to Trump that they would not have found a way to have that released and spread far and wide ?
I mean the democrats attempted to perpetrate a fraud on the American people by covering up for the chronically infirmed and highly debilitated President Biden .Imagine that trying to trick the US public that what they saw in front of the eyes wasn't what they were seeing in front of their eyes ,like WTF ?
Where is the court and media in that i.e skewering and calling out the Obamas, Clintons, Clooney's , and the Democrat mafia ? No instead a few of the media has written mia-culpa's on the cover ups ,just a disgrace.
To add further shame they then ditch the old guy like you put out the rubbish ,and attempt yet a greater fraud by trying to conjure up the myth that the next candidate (that none of the rank and file voted for) was a shrewd, highly intelligent, erudite, and sharp witted women who could take the Presidential reins.
Yet again this failed despite all the billions behind her and the leftard media soft balling her as she was revealed to be a vacuous, slow ,half witted ,walking word salad and about as sharp as a bowling ball with little in the way of any idea what business she had being within 1000 miles of the White House .Like honestly you couldn't make this stuff up .
Anyways most of the Epstein files apparently have been released ,I think there is another tranche coming out soon ,and I think some of the names have been redacted as there is ongoing investigations into those individuals etc .

In my own subjective opinion, based on nothing more than a hunch, I’m sure his name is mentioned in the files, though it’s probably not material in nature.


What’s bizarre is the lack of action on it. Sure, there are some files that can’t be released, but according to numerous reports, there’s far more material in there.

“While the Oversight Committee has subpoenaed all the files, only about 1 per cent have been turned over.”

Part of the 'Epstein files' have been released. Here's what they do, and don't, include

Footage of police searches inside Jeffrey Epstein's home, witness and victim interview tapes, and flight logs were among the swathes of files posted on Google Drive.

www.abc.net.au

If I put my tin foil hat on, I’d say the only plausible explanation is that some powerful people are mentioned, not necessarily guilty of anything, but named nonetheless. Why it wasn’t released earlier is anyone’s guess.

 

[manlyfan76]

I wonder why the democrats didn’t release them when they tried everything else to destroy Trump?

Shame on them for not if he is in there…

My take is that it's obvious trump and Epstein were very close for a decade. Not a debatable point.
So yes he was all over the files.



As far a no release of the files I would say that the big political doners are in there. As much as trump is, and this is why so many voted not to release. I mean FFS they are effectively protecting pdf's and child trafficking.
They need their political donors more than anything.

 

[Brookie1973]

Here’s why so many Epstein posts again all of a sudden. Classic coordinated group think deflection from the sad old Democrats, getting lapped up by the usual suspects. Peace in the Middle East, US Government shutdown? Who cares.

 

[47MVEagle]

🤣 look at you posting year old articles… really is desperate times for you guys. September 2024 this was published & you are sharing it now why?

1. Why did you ignore the 5 other articles I posted & choose this one to respond to?

2. What does an article’s age have to do with its veracity? Trump is still selling these watches, among many other items, from his online store.

3. Do you have anything to say about the 5 articles I posted prior to the one about watches?

 

[47MVEagle]

I wonder why the democrats didn’t release them when they tried everything else to destroy Trump?

Shame on them for not if he is in there…

Exactly!

So why not release them now?

 

[47MVEagle]

Agreed - it’s getting embarrassing at this point. Posting years old articles & hoping no one notices to keep the hate train rolling 🤣🤦‍♂️

Ignoring posts about what Trump has said & done about measles outbreaks, autism, Tylenol & asking Netanyahu to be pardoned to focus on an article about him selling watches simply because of the date it was issued is very telling.

 

[47MVEagle]

Yeah, you've really set him off, it's like a posting frenzy gone crazy.

I see you’ve chosen not to address any of the articles I posted but you’re big on defending Trump & talking him up for what’s now happening in the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Do you believe that balances out the things he’s said & done in regards to a large increase in measles outbreaks, his comments on autism & Tylenol, him using his position to sell cryptocurrency, watches & other Trump branded paraphernalia, endorsing Tesla cars, & asking for Netanyahu to be pardoned?

 

[Ohgeez]

1. Why did you ignore the 5 other articles I posted & choose this one to respond to?

2. What does an article’s age have to do with its veracity? Trump is still selling these watches, among many other items, from his online store.

3. Do you have anything to say about the 5 articles I posted prior to the one about watches?

I skim over all the articles posted in here by you. I’m certainly not reading all of them when you are known to post 5+ in 10 minutes…
That 1 article specifically caught my eye immediately because it said ‘former president’.

Why don’t you go ahead & explain to us what relevance Trump selling watches while he wasn’t president has? 🤣🤣

 

[47MVEagle]

Let’s see some reasonable answers from the Trump crew before we move on to discussing some other important issues.

 

[Ohgeez]

I see you’ve chosen not to address any of the articles I posted but you’re big on defending Trump & talking him up for what’s now happening in the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Do you believe that balances out the things he’s said & done in regards to a large increase in measles outbreaks, his comments on autism & Tylenol, him using his position to sell cryptocurrency, watches & other Trump branded paraphernalia, endorsing Tesla cars, & asking for Netanyahu to be pardoned?

Give it a break. As if you think everyone is genuinely going to read through all the articles you spam in every day. Use your words if you want genuine debate & people will be more inclined to reply

 

[Eagle 1]

I see you’ve chosen not to address any of the articles I posted but you’re big on defending Trump & talking him up for what’s now happening in the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Do you believe that balances out the things he’s said & done in regards to a large increase in measles outbreaks, his comments on autism & Tylenol, him using his position to sell cryptocurrency, watches & other Trump branded paraphernalia, endorsing Tesla cars, & asking for Netanyahu to be pardoned?

Give it a break. As if you think everyone is genuinely going to read through all the articles you spam in every day. Use your words if you want genuine debate & people will be more inclined to reply

Exactly...

 

[47MVEagle]

I skim over all the articles posted in here by you. I’m certainly not reading all of them when you are known to post 5+ in 10 minutes…
That 1 article specifically caught my eye immediately because it said ‘former president’.

Why don’t you go ahead & explain to us what relevance Trump selling watches while he wasn’t president has? 🤣🤣

No one’s buying that excuse & you know it.

I’ll take that as tacit admission you endorse everything Trump does without independent thought & you’re not interested in reasonable discussion.

Onto ignore for you 😂

One down, how many more to go? 🤔

 

[47MVEagle]

Exactly...

Oh look, another one who would rather avoid reasonable discussion & cheerlead instead.

Interesting that, when you’ve been writing essay length posts defending Trump these past couple of pages - I’ll assume that means you don’t expect anyone to read them too.

Another on ignore 😂

Two down… 🤔