MIGHTYEAGLE
Member
What do Greenturd and Hooper have in common....
They have nothing up Top.
They have nothing up Top.
Hooper is hands down the biggest wanker in sports journalism (Sloth and Weirdler aren’t far behind.) He has truly taken the dark art of buffoonery to an elite level. I can’t watch him for fear of kicking my dogs. He attempts to come across as a knockabout hard man, and the “he’s an ornament to the game” line which he parrots ten times every week brings bile to the back of my throat.Yeah Kent was arguing quite strongly I thought around the snake skivvy similarities. That knob Hooper kept trying to say how different the circumstances were, but when pressed on it could not come up with a sound argument. Imo they are no different. GI would not have given it away without the guarantee of $$$. Kent to Hooper “move on you’re boring me now” or words to that effect as Hooper kept trying to argue the toss. On a side note, is there a bigger tosser of a journo than Hooper? Can’t stand him. He reeks of privileged, spoilt brat.
Yeah couldn’t agree more on Kent. It’s like you don’t know which one ur gonna get. Goes in to bat for manly one night, the next he’s sinking the boot in. Crawled on Tuesday’s on 360 is by far the best of the three, not that it’s hard competition.Hooper is hands down the biggest wanker in sports journalism (Sloth and Weirdler aren’t far behind.) He has truly taken the dark art of buffoonery to an elite level. I can’t watch him for fear of kicking my dogs. He attempts to come across as a knockabout hard man, and the “he’s an ornament to the game” line which he parrots ten times every week brings bile to the back of my throat.
The biggest problem with Paul (I’m so controversial) Kent is the way in which he flips and flops on the big issues. One night he may appear intent on holding the NRL to a mild form of accountability, only to bend over and expose his bare ass to them the next.
Paul Crawley is the only guy who shows any interest in doing his job with a mindset of impartial objectivity.
Lol... your initial post got me all riled up mate.Kev, any chance next time you can just say what's on your mind.
Don't beat around the bush son.
You absolutely nailed it mate...
Hooper is hands down the biggest wanker in sports journalism (Sloth and Weirdler aren’t far behind.) He has truly taken the dark art of buffoonery to an elite level. I can’t watch him for fear of kicking my dogs. He attempts to come across as a knockabout hard man, and the “he’s an ornament to the game” line which he parrots ten times every week brings bile to the back of my throat.
The biggest problem with Paul (I’m so controversial) Kent is the way in which he flips and flops on the big issues. One night he may appear intent on holding the NRL to a mild form of accountability, only to bend over and expose his bare ass to them the next.
Paul Crawley is the only guy who shows any interest in doing his job with a mindset of impartial objectivity.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |