Huh?
It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).
Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
Huh?
And he'll adapt, throw a dummy, or play short, and burn them. In time, oppositions will try and read him, but in time, his game intelligence will evolve too
Could be very boring to watch if he plays it safe or sticks with his stock standard plays or could be exciting if there is space and time allowing him to run at defenders.Will be fascinating to see him at 5/8, must admit. My first thought was it will diminish our chances because we can't afford to give up any possession to the Eels, and this is one area Josh needs to improve on.
If he doesn't give up possession, though, he could even end up the match-winner. I won't be there but will definitely catch the telecast.
(After all the media adulation for Sam Walker and now Walsh, just hope he doesn't feel he has to come up with miracle plays all the time. But I think he'll be fine)
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).
Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).
Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
Only if it’s the same weight not sizeI recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.
Touche lol.. you know what I mean - i.e. his ability and skillset has the potential to fool oppositions, the more experience he gains, and the more selective he is with the no-look passing. def adds x-factorThe no-look dummy. He will be unstoppable.
I don't get the humourOnly if it’s the same weight not size
It’s very technical I’m sure some on here will coach you.I
I don't get the humour
No it's a question of densityI
I don't get the humour
Not very dense at allNo it's a question of density
fat or muscle?Not very dense at all
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.
Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!
just sayin’
About time an Aussie punk rock band sounds Aussie also
which way?Someone should tell schuster that he just needs to turn his head 90 degrees when he passes.......it’s not that hard!
just sayin’
Upwhich way?
I think deception is the word that should be considered in this instanceSomeone should tell schuster that he just needs to turn his head 90 degrees when he passes.......it’s not that hard!
just sayin’
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |