The No-Look News (Schuster Chronicles)

Will be fascinating to see him at 5/8, must admit. My first thought was it will diminish our chances because we can't afford to give up any possession to the Eels, and this is one area Josh needs to improve on.
If he doesn't give up possession, though, he could even end up the match-winner. I won't be there but will definitely catch the telecast.
(After all the media adulation for Sam Walker and now Walsh, just hope he doesn't feel he has to come up with miracle plays all the time. But I think he'll be fine)
Could be very boring to watch if he plays it safe or sticks with his stock standard plays or could be exciting if there is space and time allowing him to run at defenders.

At the moment i see his class but bored with his passing and some of the lines he runs, mind you his passing options have been limited by where and when he gets the ball in our structure and how Manly setup so not entirely his fault that is for sure.
 
It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).

Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.
 
It's just from an old 'fake' argument on here some years ago about muscle weighing more than fat (or vice versa).

Nothing to do with you per se , just adding what has been almost a ST 'meme' comment.
Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!

just sayin’
 
The no-look dummy. He will be unstoppable.
Touche lol.. you know what I mean - i.e. his ability and skillset has the potential to fool oppositions, the more experience he gains, and the more selective he is with the no-look passing. def adds x-factor

btw i could prob name a few players who would be fooled by a no-look dummy!
 
I recall it had something to do with me originally and then twisted into a fake argument that confused me. I never once stated fat weighs more than muscle though, at the same size muscle weighs more than fat due to density.

Bro it wasn’t fake......it was a scientific analysis of fact!

just sayin’


I'M ON SMOKO...

SO LEAVE ME ALONE!



@Ranga
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
24 19 5 148 44
24 17 7 212 40
24 16 8 120 38
24 15 9 172 36
24 15 9 109 36
24 14 10 21 34
24 13 10 107 33
24 13 11 132 32
24 12 12 125 30
24 12 12 21 30
24 10 14 -76 26
24 9 14 -146 25
24 9 15 -135 24
24 9 15 -181 24
24 8 16 -130 22
24 6 18 -199 18
24 6 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom