Another thing that struck around the gap between clubs is that the chooks can qualify for the grand final then can have the luxury to bring in players like Mitchell and Napa.
and possibly the best fullback to ever play the game.
I don't care if I get 500 disagrees, but there is no way that Brett Stewart is a better player than Billy Slater.Sorry, but bull$hit.
Wombat and Snake were better players.
If Billy Slater was a Manly player, and Brett Stewart was from the Storm, you wouldn't even remotely consider Brett Stewart on a par with Billy Slater.Sorry, but bull$hit.
Wombat and Snake were better players.
While I agree that there are serious issues with the cap and TPA's.... let's not forget that in the jet are the best current coach in the NRL and possibly the best fullback to ever play the game. They are allowed to be wealthy. I really don't like the Storm (and I think Billy should have been suspended), but we as a club have enjoyed some amazing success against them and since then we have cocked it up for ourselves. I have no doubt that the Storm are currently under the cap, so I don't have a problem with it...... as for the Roosters... well I have serious doubts about them.
Interesting debate for sure.... I think you could argue that even since the salary cap he has achieved a pretty good record. Since 2012, the Storm have been in 4 grand finals. They have won 2 and may win a 3rd on Sunday. In my opinion their roster is in no way stacked, yet they continue to succeed.I am not sold on the Bellamy super coach idea. He has had the best assets that money could buy, a huge nursery and is operating with 3 times the staff of the poorer clubs including us, had to cheat the salary cap to achieve any greatness and currently runs with the highest registered TPA's of any club or 2 rep stars more than the poorer clubs.
His Origin venture was an absolute failure as well.
Was that a Beta or V H S - V C R player , image can be important sometimeA Manly photo would have the player sitting on a milk crate in a demountable writing his own statement in crayon, with Peter Peters trying to work a VCR to watch the incident whilst scoffing into a meat pie.
But their T P A :s amount to some 850 k according to the ' official " reporting . far exceeding most clubs . Not a bad advantage to have in any given year irrespective of Bellamy "s coaching rating .Interesting debate for sure.... I think you could argue that even since the salary cap he has achieved a pretty good record. Since 2012, the Storm have been in 4 grand finals. They have won 2 and may win a 3rd on Sunday. In my opinion their roster is in no way stacked, yet they continue to succeed.
I don't care if I get 500 disagrees, but there is no way that Brett Stewart is a better player than Billy Slater.
I agree that Slater was a better overall player; however, Stewart was better in more than just support play. Stewart was a much better passer, he was a natural, I have seen Slater pass out over the sideline on numerous occasions. Brett could pull off impossible passes and set up numerous tries. Brett was also better under the high ball.If Billy Slater was a Manly player, and Brett Stewart was from the Storm, you wouldn't even remotely consider Brett Stewart on a par with Billy Slater.
Billy is better in every facet of the game except support play, which led to Stewart's higher try scoring rate.
Let alone the fact that Slater is 35 and still at the top of his game, and Stewart is 33 and 2 years retired. I'm a Manly fan (and a Stewart fan) through and through, but I'll call things for what they are, not through some Manly tinted glasses.
Have a poll on any neutral based Rugby League forum, and Billy would get 90% of the vote.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 70 | 10 |
3 | Warriors | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -18 | 10 |
4 | Broncos | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 54 | 8 |
5 | Raiders | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 36 | 8 |
6 | Dragons | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 8 |
7 | Rabbitohs | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -36 | 8 |
8 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 28 | 6 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sharks | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 6 |
12 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -26 | 6 |
14 | Knights | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | -40 | 6 |
15 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |
16 | Roosters | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -80 | 4 |
17 | Eels | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -123 | 2 |