Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Team news: 2GB!

Blunty

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
372
Reaction score
0
Ballin to drop off bench, what is Des doing!

1. Robertson
2. NBQ
3. Neumann
4. Menzies
5. Hicks
6. Burns
7. Orford
8. King
9. Monaghan
10. Bryant
11. Watmough
12. Stewart
13. Williamson

15. Hall
16. Sione
17. Afamasaga
18. Cuthbertson


I suppose at least we get to see both the islanders get a run on the bench.
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
7,469
Reaction score
2,876
FMD.

If just 1 back goes down we're up the creek in terms of a re-shuffle.
 

Jatz Crackers

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
9,326
Reaction score
1,636
Thats the first time Ive seen Des drop the 18th man off before game day.

Either ballin must be crook or this is a ploy ?
 

Garts

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
5,622
Reaction score
975
I can only assume he thinks we need the extra forward muscle to bash the young inexperienced dragons pack.
 

Nutzcraw

Active Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2005
Messages
4,826
Reaction score
4
FMD

Some of you boys deadset have pictures of M. Ballin in your wallet.

Get over it.. he's not our saviour for christ sake.
 

Garts

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
5,622
Reaction score
975
Well he is a very handsome man Nutz and he also adds alot to the team imo, we are a better outfit when he is the 17.
 

Jatz Crackers

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Messages
9,326
Reaction score
1,636
Get over it.. he's not our saviour for christ sake.

FMD. I dont see anyone is suggesting that he is Nutz.

FMD. Comments have been centred on the fact we 4 large forwards on the bench with no back replacements.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,154
Reaction score
7,846
FMD. It was a lonely friday night
 

Kiwi Eagle

Moderator
Staff member
2018 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
16,311
Reaction score
7,584
I would probably have Ballin in the 17, but am excited about seeing both the PL boys having a go

In terms of back replacements, it makes absolutely no difference. Ballin is a forward that can only play hooker, was no cover at all for any back dramas. If i read it right Watmough was going to be our centre cover in an weather Ballin is there or not.

I see what Nutz is saying too, from what is said about Ballin on here he should be on about 800k for next season ;)
 

kingyfan

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
639
Reaction score
6
If one of our backs are injured then I can only think that Des will put choc there (or cuthbo on the wing). !pray: !pray: !pray:

I am really looking forward to seeing what Jack A and Sione can do. I hope they smash the faggot dragon pack to peices.
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
7,469
Reaction score
2,876
In terms of back replacements, it makes absolutely no difference. Ballin is a forward that can only play hooker, was no cover at all for any back dramas. If i read it right Watmough was going to be our centre cover in an weather Ballin is there or not.

If a back goes down, we can move Ballin into hooker to free up Monaghan into the halves and burns into one of the other positions.

He doesn't need to be a direct cover for an injury. Having the ability to free up an extra position I would have thought would be important considering beaver is already in center. Right now, nobody off the bench can slot into a back line.

Watmough could move back but I would rather see him in the second row considering his current for. That would be like removing our major strike weapon this weekend.
 

PEPSI

Active Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
2,578
Reaction score
2
lets face it the Hooker/utility forward we have been running with has been getting little or no time anyway , 20 mins if that.

so better off gambling with 4 fowards who will all get good time on trhe field.

oh yeah forgot....FMD!!!
 

Downie

Active Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
732
Reaction score
3
FMD, I'd rather Bani on the wing for NBQ. Or even Hicks to the centres and Neumann drops out. I'd like to see what he can do.
 

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
7,469
Reaction score
2,876
FMD you guys.

Whats with all the FMD's?
 

Kiwi Eagle

Moderator
Staff member
2018 Tipping Competitor
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
16,311
Reaction score
7,584
[quote author=Kiwi Eagle]

In terms of back replacements, it makes absolutely no difference. Ballin is a forward that can only play hooker, was no cover at all for any back dramas. If i read it right Watmough was going to be our centre cover in an weather Ballin is there or not.

If a back goes down, we can move Ballin into hooker to free up Monaghan into the halves and burns into one of the other positions.

He doesn't need to be a direct cover for an injury. Having the ability to free up an extra position I would have thought would be important considering beaver is already in center. Right now, nobody off the bench can slot into a back line.

Watmough could move back but I would rather see him in the second row considering his current for. That would be like removing our major strike weapon this weekend.

[/quote]

With Ballin on the bench the same scenario occurs of no-one being able to slot into the backline, it was exactly the same as most weeks this year when we have had a hooker on the bench.

Using the scenario above where you fitted Ballin into the side, Monaghan to 6, and Burns to plug the hole, we were then looking at Burns in the centres or something. I would rather see Watmough in the centres and Afamasaga in the 2nd row.

The only area i think we lose leaving Ballin off the bench is if 1 of Monaghan or Burns goes down. My guess would be that Williamson would be Des' stopgap for 6 and 13 in that scenario, which isnt ideal
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
Reaction score
529
FMD Ballin must be the most patient man in australia.
 

Members online

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Panthers 20 18 1 1 299 37
2 Storm 20 16 0 4 258 32
3 Eels 20 15 0 5 104 30
4 Roosters 20 14 0 6 230 28
5 Raiders 20 14 0 6 128 28
6 Rabbitohs 20 12 0 8 169 24
7 Knights 20 11 1 8 47 23
8 Sharks 20 10 0 10 0 20
9 Titans 20 9 0 11 -117 18
10 Warriors 20 8 0 12 -115 16
11 Tigers 20 7 0 13 -65 14
12 Dragons 20 7 0 13 -74 14
13 Sea Eagles 20 7 0 13 -134 14
14 Cowboys 20 5 0 15 -152 10
15 Bulldogs 20 3 0 17 -222 6
16 Broncos 20 3 0 17 -356 6
Top Bottom