ahh the dynamic balmain connectionWoods and Aloiai. F*ck me dead. Clueless clown posse.
ahh the dynamic balmain connectionWoods and Aloiai. F*ck me dead. Clueless clown posse.
He’s starting to look like our 2023 version of Myles.
Never heard it mentioned that you can use that money to top up a player.
Pretty sure it is only available to sign a "like-for-like" player extra to the cap.
RTS would heave been great but we asked and he's not available.
I can't think of anyone else who is a) available and b) would improve the team, even for depth.
It's not much of a compensation scheme really, more of a token gesture scheme.
RTS would have been perfect , but I agree any others available were a downgrade on Garrick.
Really rate Blake Taafe. Would have loved to see him here, even as temporary cover for Tommy, although it looks like he might be off the Bulldogs at some point.Lachie Miller, Blake Taafe, Daine Laurie, Jayden Campbell all blokes who are first grade ability who cant get a regular gig who would improve our team this year IMO. Not bagging Garrick he's decent as a fullback BUT playing him fullback you lose him as a top winger and replace him with a lesser winger and there's a big net loss there.
Lachie Miller, Blake Taafe, Daine Laurie, Jayden Campbell all blokes who are first grade ability who cant get a regular gig who would improve our team this year IMO. Not bagging Garrick he's decent as a fullback BUT playing him fullback you lose him as a top winger and replace him with a lesser winger and there's a big net loss there.
What for? They left. Give players who will be here a turn first. Lots of good performers for blacktown of late. Seibold will probably start him now he's got rid of them next season though....who's out and who's in ... any surprises ?
and Samuela has to get a run ..
What for? They left. Give players who will be here a turn first. Lots of good performers for blacktown of late. Seibold will probably start him now he's got rid of them next season though....
Because he may be the best player we have to bring in ... we are trying to make the semifinals .. no value in being childish about it .. it's a professional sport.
Close to the mark me thinks. I would start toff ahead of lodge and bring latter on for better impact. Gordon got to be close to a spot on the bench you would think. Especially in and around those big st george forwards. If the case would be at the expense of bullymore not woods. I think the coach likes our Sharon. Dont think Samuel will get a run.1 Garrick
2 Tippytoes
3 Parker
4 Koula
5 Saab
6 Shu
7 Chez
8 Keppie
9 Croker
10 Lodge
11 Oka
12 Tuilagi
13 Jake
14 Matterson
15 Gordon/ Samuel / Woods
16 Toff
17 Bully
Lodge would play 2 stints 30min and 20min+ Bully can play big minutes but I think Toff and Keppie max out about 20min stints , Start Lodge to fit his minutes in (Paseka role) , Would move Jake to prop to get Matterson on in the middle , I think Woods will get the bench spot over Gordy and SamuelClose to the mark me thinks. I would start toff ahead of lodge and bring latter on for better impact. Gordon got to be close to a spot on the bench you would think. Especially in and around those big st george forwards. If the case would be at the expense of bullymore not woods. I think the coach likes our Sharon. Dont think Samuel will get a run.
My team:
Backs: same
Sippers
Froggy
Jurbo
Guacca
Bully
Matterson
Bench:
Kewpie
Lodge
Kelma
Gordon
Kelma over Samuela all day. One is signed with the club until 2025 and the other heading to the Tigers after 5 first grade games for us. I would've liked to keep him but I'd rather we prioritise players that will be with the club beyond this season, and Samuela's potential doesn't really mean anything to us anymoreFor what it's worth ... (and that is probably what you paid for it) ... here is the team I would select ..
Garrick
Saab
Parker
Koula
Tuppaluppa
The Shooey
DCE
Keppie .. (goes better starting for mine)
Froggy
Sipley
S. Fainu .. (just offers more potential and X for me)
Haumole
Jake
Matterson/Arffurs/Gordie Can Tango ... (Not fused)
Lodge ... (Off the bench to maintain the rage)
Bully
Woods
Nothing to do with being childish over it.Because he may be the best player we have to bring in ... we are trying to make the semifinals .. no value in being childish about it .. it's a professional sport.
If, as you say, we should be building for next season then the biggest issue we need addressing now is our lack of pace, mobility, versatility and attacking skills of our 10 leading forwards. I excuse Froggy from this criticism because he is game-aware and does have a suite of skills.Nothing to do with being childish over it.
We wont make the finals. Build for next season. Even if we are trying to make the fianls.. he is a youngster who hasnt done anything that special playing first grade in my opinion. Hes looked decent but for me will be a liability with his temper on the field. I would prefer to use a player who wants to be here. His head is not.
Kelma over Samuela all day. One is signed with the club until 2025 and the other heading to the Tigers after 5 first grade games for us. I would've liked to keep him but I'd rather we prioritise players that will be with the club beyond this season, and Samuela's potential doesn't really mean anything to us anymore
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |