Stats are like mini skirts, what they show is great, but what they hide is vitalMust be looking at different stats to you.
111 run meters for Marty.
114 for Olaka’atu.
21 tackles for Marty.
38 for Bully.
25 post contact meters for Marty.
55 for Olaka’atu.
36 for Sippers.
25 Paseka.
7.92 Avg run meters for Marty.
8.71 for Olaka’atu.
9.27 for Sippers.
9.16 for Paseka.
8 for Keppie.
As our highest paid forward, I’d want more from him than 44mins of the above to be honest.
Hahaha that's great, I'm stealing that!Stats are like mini skirts, what they show is great, but what they hide is vital
I just like to use that line any opportunity I can
um I hate to be a wet blanket... Bullemor is a backrower - Marty a prop..... Backrowers should do way more tackles than props...... Bullemor played the whole game I think - Marty didn't... the more game time the more tackles you should make....Marty doesn't choose how many minutes he played, Des does... the fact that Marty had way more total metres despite having a lesser average run meters than the other props says that Marty did a hell of a lot more work than the other two and had way more carries... the Big O is a backrower running wide and should have more post contact metres than running into the teeth of the defence... As someone said - very easy to manipulate stats to tell the story you wantMust be looking at different stats to you.
111 run meters for Marty.
114 for Olaka’atu.
21 tackles for Marty.
38 for Bully.
25 post contact meters for Marty.
55 for Olaka’atu.
36 for Sippers.
25 Paseka.
7.92 Avg run meters for Marty.
8.71 for Olaka’atu.
9.27 for Sippers.
9.16 for Paseka.
8 for Keppie.
As our highest paid forward, I’d want more from him than 44mins of the above to be honest.
um I hate to be a wet blanket... Bullemor is a backrower - Marty a prop..... Backrowers should do way more tackles than props...... Bullemor played the whole game I think - Marty didn't... the more game time the more tackles you should make....Marty doesn't choose how many minutes he played, Des does... the fact that Marty had way more total metres despite having a lesser average run meters than the other propse says that Marty did a hell of a lot more work than the other two and had way more carries... the Big O is a backrower running wide and should have more post contact metres than running into the teeth of the defence... As someone said - very easy to manipulate stats to tell the story you want
yes sorry... silly of me to make those rookie errors lol but I didn't say it was numbnutted and I did apologise by saying I was being a wet blanketWTF .. are you saying that comparing the stats of a 40 min player against the stats of an 80 min player was a numbnutted thing .
Damn, I was just comparing crokers stats against Lawton's and thinking Carl had a shocker ... 🤣
Hahaha that's great, I'm stealing that!
You got big balls Ryan and I like itJT is completely disillusioned at The Cows. He'd light it up with support from his coach (something Des is very adept at). My trade would be:
To Cowboys
1. Marty Taupau;
2. Lachlan Croker;
3. Rookie (Weekes) - I KNOW this is a LOT, but Nth QLD have to win as well.
To Manly
1. Jason Taumalolo ($250k Cap hit retained);
2. Jake Granville (to retire at seasons end).
I'd then be grooming Jamie Humphries for DCE's spot (I don't extend DCE), leaving our halves for 2024 as (06. Schuster, 07. Humphries) - and a hell of a lot of cap space.
Is Granville any better a hooker than Lawton? If not, then we definitely don't need another mediocre hooker on the books.If the Cows wanted a player swap, I'd take Jake Granville in a heartbeat (obviously not as valuable as Marty, but still). He's been coming off the bench for them and he's a specialist hooker. Not as young as he once was (who is?) but I reckon a change of club would do him the world of good.
absolutely correctWho the hell is going to step in for Marty. We're struggling for go forward as it is and they want to unload him. Utter madness unless the Cows are stupid enough to swap JT for Marty.
Poor fella.
Still having issues admitting you were wrong. Thinking of you mate.
Ps - comparing Saabs pros (shiny things I think you called them) with his cons (missed tackles) is all about understanding a players worth in a team. You (incorrectly) thought Saab wasn’t worth it - he proved you wrong in 2021.
With Taupau, his pros (average output for a prop) vs cons (salary cap chunk) is a similar comparison.
Sadly, you seem to miss this point here again.
If you can tell me how his weekend output warrants $800k - I’ll probably agree with you - but I fear you are just missing the whole point yet again and can chalk up another example of being wrong.
I feel for you mate.
Admitting you are wrong appears something you still need to work on.
So do we assume if you had been the one negotiating his current deal, Marty wouldn't have been playing for Manly for the last few years.My point is pretty simple, Marty’s weekend stats (and all of the past few years) don’t warrant his chunk of the salary cap.
I stole it from the old Indian cricket commentator Navjot Sidhu
Not sure but I think the original problem he had with the new coach was that his minutes were reduced ... I think JT wanted to keep playing 80 but coach had the idea that he would be more effective playing shorter more powerful stints ..How good would it be if Lolo come here! Problem is JT is unhappy because he isn't playing lock. I know potato potatah.. but he is playing prop mins. Where would that leave Jurbo? Vice versa. I think lolo definitely needs a change in order to get back to his best. Jeremiah Nanai would be my other pick for a swap.. but we have to many backrowers as it stands.
Yup, that's why it's so hard to compare forwards (or any player for that matter) who doesn't play the full 80 minutes, statistically. You can't compare their raw stats. It needs to be average per time on field. Average metres per run. Average post contact metres per run. Then there's other parametres like where they play on the field. What time they stay on the field.No, unlike you I am competent with reading and comprehension, and I never entered your current debate over Marty's worth ... other than to point out the absolute stupidity of comparing how many runs, tackles and meters made between a bloke that played 40 mins compared to a bloke that played 80 min in a different position ..
whilst you now wish to deflect attention away from that nonsense by changing topic be aware that people are generally not so easily fooled .
That and if I remember correctly I think payten called him out round 1 last year about his performance or something alike in the post match conference. That would give me the ****s tooNot sure but I think the original problem he had with the new coach was that his minutes were reduced ... I think JT wanted to keep playing 80 but coach had the idea that he would be more effective playing shorter more powerful stints ..
That plan hasn't worked
Yup, that's why it's so hard to compare forwards (or any player for that matter) who doesn't play the full 80 minutes, statistically. You can't compare their raw stats. It needs to be average per time on field. Average metres per run. Average post contact metres per run. Then there's other parametres like where they play on the field. What time they stay on the field.
It's a really, really tough exercise.
100% spot on mate, and this is coming from a stats guy. I gave up comparing players statistically (hell, I tried to do it with Croker and current / ex Hookers) but it's HARD.
Regarding Marty: Love, love, LOVE him both on and off the park. Adds leadership, adds control and a calm head (I recall him pulling Suli into line on the field for being a banana). How do you add value to that for example? If I didn't think he was leaving next season, I'd want him extended.
But I'm sure someone like the Cowboys will sign him for 3 years or something. Not sure that's something Manly looks at given our history with ageing vets.
X Can't find that Suli event on youtube, sorry mate.
That
That and if I remember correctly I think payten called him out round 1 last year about his performance or something alike in the post match conference. That would give me the ****s too
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |