Spammers ordered to pay $A1.32b

Discussion in 'General Discussion Forum' started by The Wheel, Dec 20, 2004.



Share This Page

  1. The Wheel

    By:The WheelDec 20, 2004
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,891
    Likes Received:
    1,264
    Likes Given:
    773
    Ratings:
    +3,850 /126
    Davenport, Iowa
    December 20, 2004 - 10:34AM

    Page Tools
    Email to a friend Printer format
    A federal US judge has awarded an internet service provider more than $US1 billion ($A1.32 billion) in what is believed to be the largest judgement ever against spammers.

    Robert Kramer, whose company provides email service for about 5000 subscribers in eastern Iowa, filed suit against 300 spammers after his inbound mail servers received up to 10 million spam emails a day in 2000, according to court documents.

    US District Judge Charles R. Wolle filed default judgements on Friday against three of the defendants under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act (RICO) and the Iowa Ongoing Criminal Conduct Act.

    AMP Dollar Savings Inc. of Mesa, Arizona, was ordered to pay $US720 million ($A952.0 million) and Cash Link Systems Inc of Miami, Florida, was ordered to pay $US360 million ($A476.0 million). The third company, Florida-based TEI Marketing Group, was ordered to pay $US140,000 ($A185,111.73).

    "It's definitely a victory for all of us that open up our email and find lewd and malicious and fraudulent email in our boxes every day," Kramer said after the ruling.

    Advertisement
    AdvertisementKramer's attorney, Kelly Wallace, said he is unlikely to ever collect the judgement, which was made possible by an Iowa law that allows plaintiffs to claim damages of $US10 ($A13.22) per spam message. The judgments were then tripled under RICO.

    "We hope to recover at least his costs," Wallace said.

    There were no telephone listings for the three companies in Arizona and Florida. Nobody replied to an email sent today to Cash Link Systems.

    According to court documents, no lawyers for the defendants were present during a bench trial in November. The lawsuit continues against other named defendants.

    Laura Atkins, president of SpamCon Foundation, an anti-spamming organisation based in Palo Alto, California, said she believed it was the largest judgement ever in an anti-spam lawsuit.

    "This is just incredible," she said. "I'm not aware of anything that's been over $US100 million ($A132.22 million)."
     
  2. Fluffy

    By:FluffyDec 20, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    1,893
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,939 /271
    Finally the US gets something right.

    only took them 400+ years.

    I want my 10 bucks per spam email
     
  3. byso

    By:bysoDec 20, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    I reckon there's a few posters in manly websites who should be delivered a similar penalty for posting there crap :p :twisted:
     
  4. Fluffy

    By:FluffyDec 20, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    1,893
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,939 /271
    Like that Byso character.....

    lol
     
  5. CC_Eagle

    By:CC_EagleDec 20, 2004
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    695
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 /0
    What a wanker he is!
     
  6. byso

    By:bysoDec 20, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    <span style='font-size:30pt;line-height:100%'>hahaha........YKM</span>

    At least i know who my friends are :p Why are ppl so un kind :cry: :cry:

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  7. Matabele

    By:MatabeleDec 21, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Why is it considered unkind to just come out and tell the plain truth?
     
  8. byso

    By:bysoDec 21, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    9,616
    Likes Received:
    89
    Likes Given:
    99
    Ratings:
    +113 /0
    Blow it out your arse. :evil: :evil:

    Latham lover :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  9. Matabele

    By:MatabeleDec 21, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Touchy touchy.
     
  10. Fluffy

    By:FluffyDec 21, 2004
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,548
    Likes Received:
    1,893
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,939 /271
    Byso, such language.

    Spose it could be worse, he could call you a Howard lover.

    How funny is it that one of the characters in the cartoon the Invincibles looks like howard.
     
  11. Hopium

    By:HopiumDec 21, 2004
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    447
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    The best contraception known to woman kind... Howard.... YUK!

    I just find it strange that he has a mistress in Canberra... :oops:

    If only the victims could get money....

    Hmmmm... A court case like that in Australia would be awesome. Especially since one of the companies that would be hit by the case would be that of Howard's son... remember how he spammed voters with Liberal stuff, and was paid to do it by his Daddy?? WANKER

    Hehehe... REVENGE!!!
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top