SeaEagleRock8 said:
fLIP said:
He can carry on like a child all he likes about his brother,
What on earth?
Seems a few here are overreacting.
Look, I know things look bleak, seeing that we haven't won a comp for 41 years, we are coming last and half our squad just got busted for drug cheating, we've been exposed for massive systematic salary cap rorting and we've had 40 put on us in our last 3 games, but sheesh, get some perspective, there's got to be an upside somewhere.
Are you suggesting that because there are positives in situations there's no need to comment on a single negative.
I will continue anyway.
The club does not need to tell employees "don't comment to media" unless unfavorable comments are likely to be made. Enough has been said on record by players to know certain cliques within the club aren't happy with the lack of contract offer to Glen.
I highly doubt the aim of "don't talk to media" means to be as vague as possible during your media appearances in order to perpetuate continued rumors of unrest within the playing group. If Stewart and Watmough aren't asking for a release and looking to leave mid contract do we honestly believe the club would be instructing players to specifically not comment on the matter? Do we really think the club wants it appearing as if players have been told to shut up, if it's all just made up media gossip?
I don't have issues with "no comment" ect ect. Stick to those and then get along with sorting out your grievances in a grown up fashion behind closed doors. What I do have issues with is the "we aren't allowed opinions at this club", "I'm here at the moment". The petulance of it all irks me to no end.
Those "non-comments" i very much doubt are the kind of no comment the club is looking for. These statements serve only to subtly justify newspaper headlines.
If Brett can allow the treatment of his brother (which just so happens to be the way any workplace functions) to influence the way he portrays his club to the media, then I believe I have every right to be just as cynical of the way he is treating my club.
The club and by that i don't just mean 'the club itself'; but ticket buyers, members, merchandise purchasers, TV subscribers, sponsors or the out of their own pocket sign makers. The people who showed outside his trial in support who justified his innocence in the face of ignorance day in day of at work or school. These people have facilitated the lining of his and his brother's pockets with a substantial amount of money over the years, however, when a single incident does not go the way he wants it "i can't have an opinion at this club".
This could all very well be blown right out of proportion and I'd be the first to rejoice having no fire to all this smoke, however, the entire issue could be well and truly shut down right here and now by Brett saying "it's all b.s, i love the club and it's supporters for all the POSITIVES over the years and these rumors are unsubstantiated rubbish. I will be seeing out my contact." Instead, several players are focusing on the single negative which perhaps by your rule means they should get some perspective.
Until so far as the players who are making things seem so vague, vehemently deny the claims being made Ive got a real issue with it being dragged on the way it is.