Sione Fainu

The thing we are lacking ( in my humble opinion ) is when the going gets tough is a forward leader to group the players together behind the score line and say “ ** this ** , who is going to follow me in winning this game “.

Ben Kennedy was a perfect example , we won plenty of games after being behind after him screaming at his players , then taking the first hit up in the next set , turning around and screaming at them again “ see you lazy pricks that’s how it’s done “.

Inspirational stuff.
Do you think there are a lot of those players playing in the NRL now? I tried to think it through and couldn't come up with many. Have those who play the game changed?
 
@madmax I'm assuming that Walker doesn't play for us next season as he is yet to sign a contract. I am basing my squad picks on who is actually contracted for us right now. Clearly Walker has a greater impact on games then Lawton, but Lawton arguably has greater utility value. However, even if Walker does sign how many games will he play for us considering he is an anti-vaxxer?
Utility value?? Walker can play Center, 5/8, Lock & FB if desperately required. Lawton Hooker & Backrow….I dunno mate. Let’s see how all this plays out.
 
I note that Kapow is now listed as a 'Lock' on the MWSE website.
How many 'Locks' are picked in an NRL 17? I thought only one, and Jurbo is ours.
 
Utility value?? Walker can play Center, 5/8, Lock & FB if desperately required. Lawton Hooker & Backrow….I dunno mate. Let’s see how all this plays out.
Lawton started off for the Titans as a half mate. He has also played a lot at five-eight, before coming through into the NRL. The Warriors bought him to play in the halves, but he also played 4 games at centre. Due to injuries he has adapted his game to play hooker, and now is primarily used as a backrower. He covers quite a few positions in both the backs and the forwards. So yes arguably he has equal or greater utility than Walker. Walker definitely provides greater impact than Lawton, but Lawton is a better defender. Horses for courses mate.
 
The thing we are lacking ( in my humble opinion ) is when the going gets tough is a forward leader to group the players together behind the score line and say “ ** this ** , who is going to follow me in winning this game “.

Ben Kennedy was a perfect example , we won plenty of games after being behind after him screaming at his players , then taking the first hit up in the next set , turning around and screaming at them again “ see you lazy pricks that’s how it’s done “.

Inspirational stuff.
Jake?
 
He’s try’s , and hard , but doesn’t seem to have the impact ( possibly because of his game time in comparison to the Props Ive mentioned).
agree but he plays too much first receiver to be a forward leader. His efforts are divided by tackling his heart out and giving the team direction around the park and that style of play is suited to meandering rather than ball tearing. defence aside he plays more like a back
 
agree but he plays too much first receiver to be a forward leader. His efforts are divided by tackling his heart out and giving the team direction around the park and that style of play is suited to meandering rather than ball tearing. defence aside he plays more like a back
Yep the type of forward I’m talking about is the one who screams at his team mates after he’s taken a big hit up and knocked over a player or two turning around to say “ like this you lazy pricks , let’s win this ****ing game “.

That’s not Jake.
 
Yep the type of forward I’m talking about is the one who screams at his team mates after he’s taken a big hit up and knocked over a player or two turning around to say “ like this you lazy pricks , let’s win this ****ing game “.

That’s not Jake.
no jake is more of the gavin miller style player who was a great captain and ball player from hooker. we waste a forward spot on jake to a point
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 20 16 0 4 152 36
2 Storm 19 14 0 5 228 34
3 Bulldogs 19 14 0 5 122 34
4 Warriors 19 12 0 7 26 30
5 Panthers 19 11 1 7 83 29
6 Broncos 19 11 0 8 124 28
7 Sharks 20 12 0 8 43 28
8 Dolphins 19 10 0 9 171 26
9 Roosters 19 9 0 10 20 24
10 Sea Eagles 19 9 0 10 6 24
11 Dragons 19 7 0 12 -58 20
12 Tigers 20 8 0 12 -121 20
13 Cowboys 20 7 1 12 -177 19
14 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 18
15 Eels 19 6 0 13 -153 18
16 Titans 19 5 0 14 -153 16
17 Rabbitohs 20 6 0 14 -197 16
Back
Top Bottom