Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Simple version - for those struggling to comprehend

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,146
Orford is not worth 450K

if we pay that money we will not get a decent cente which we need more.
 

ManlyBacker

Winging it
Staff member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
11,588
I thought this was going to have a Mata type parable. Very disappointed.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,146
nah people were missing the point thinking that i would hate to see orford at the club.
 

sue ridgepipe

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
1,310
HAIL THE GRAND WIZARD!HAIL THE GRAND WIZARD!

speak to us oh great foolish one!speak to us!slowly!!
 

lasvegas

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
898
ssssssssshhhhhhhhhh dont wake him the red cordial has worn off. !pray: !pray:
 

Canteen Worker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,242
I have been sitting on the sideline on the other thread!

However:

Fact 1:
Halfback and Hooker handle the ball more than any other player. You must have topline players in 7 and 9 to be near the best, espcially in the end of season games where the men are quickly sorted from the boys..

Fact 2:
No side has won the comp in the past 10 years (and majority of years) without sensational players in these two positions, and usually 6 as well. Go through the combinations and this is evident.

Fact 3:
A half is usually the player that a side is built around and the type of player he is determines the style adopted by the team. There is one game to get to the semis but the real game starts there again - who will win it.

Fact 4:
Monas is untried and unproven at the highest level. In several big games over the last two years he has gone missing against top opposition. Some in our club question whether he possesses the composure to play well in the pressure of end-of-season games.

Fact 5:
Orford has been selected to represent NSW, City and is considered by all unbiased judges and fans as being in the top echelon of halves in the country.

Fact 6:
If $450 k is what it takes to build a side to win a premiership, so be it!

Conclusion:
Do you want a half that will get your team to the semis each year with a few good and a few poor performances or do you want to win???? Is it worth the extra money to get the very best. (especially as Johns, Gower, Sherwin, Head, Finch and Kimmorley are all contracted by their clubs.)

I think that summarises the discussion that has been waged this morning!
 

lasvegas

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
898
win ....... cw also should note that management obviously thought they could afford it as they front loaded a lot of contracts last year for this very reason,who are we to second guess our financial affairs when we dont know how we stand.
 

PEPSI

Active Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
2,578
CW, your just a sheep and a fool and need mummy to cry on or something like that!!!!! :D :D :D
 

c_eagle

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
855
The Bulldogs won the comp with Sherwin and Hughes, neither of which I'd call sensational.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,146
Orford is 2 -2 from finals footy.

This is gamble with very little basis.

He may have been picked but has never played SOO.

Conclusion - this is a very big gamble that will weaken our chances of strengthening the centres - our weakest position.

Please show me a team that won the premiership recently with centers anywhere near as weak as ours.
 

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Panthers 19 17 1 1 257 35
2 Storm 19 16 0 3 266 32
3 Roosters 19 14 0 5 282 28
4 Eels 19 14 0 5 100 28
5 Raiders 19 13 0 6 118 26
6 Knights 19 11 1 7 77 23
7 Rabbitohs 19 11 0 8 117 22
8 Sharks 19 10 0 9 10 20
9 Titans 19 8 0 11 -147 16
10 Tigers 19 7 0 12 -61 14
11 Sea Eagles 19 7 0 12 -122 14
12 Warriors 19 7 0 12 -127 14
13 Dragons 19 6 0 13 -82 12
14 Cowboys 19 4 0 15 -168 8
15 Bulldogs 19 3 0 16 -180 6
16 Broncos 19 3 0 16 -340 6
Top Bottom