Narrabeen Laker
Reserve Grader
You know where I stand - Darcy is a myth who lacks serious game IQ
The only question over Dylan is lasting 80 mins. It is 2 injuries he is recovering from so maybe a 20 min cameo in reserves is a good idea for him first.
I put Lane and Perrett ahead of Tanginoa so if Lussick gets a run, I think Kelepi misses out. Not saying I think that should happen but if someone does eventually drop off, it's not Lane and Perrett. Reason being, Lane and Perrett use the ball and our style is built around second phase play. Tanginoa has had a couple of good games but there are not a lot of strings to his bow. Part of me thinks that he is a good point of contrast; he tucks it under his arm and runs straight and hard. He has made some decent yards so far this year. However, I think he offers a little less than the others.
In saying that, he shouldn't be dropped for Lussick unless he plays a couple of sub-par matches and Darcy tears in hard.
Lanes only gonna get better I feel...I think you'll find the next season or two will see him establish himself as a serious player in our pack. I wonder when the big fellas off contract..Jobs Lane's to keep or lose. If he keeps putting in performances like Sunday, no way in hell he gets dropped. His 1st or 2nd tackle hit ups to make us metres out of our own D-zone were outstanding, and desperately required.
That's not saying anything about Darcy's ability - more about Lane's value add right now.
Darcy needs a few games in reggies for match fitness and also to display some maturity in his performances. We cannot afford a loose cannon in our ranks atm. He needs to prove himself and it's gonna be a good test of character for him. In times gone by he would be an automatic pic when healthy but we have a hungry young bunch of forwards working hard and playing to the coaches instructions. Its a healthy sign for us that a player of Darcys calibre may struggle to get a run this yr.It’s good competition to have
If the current squad keeps performing and don’t need to see a change ,injuries will determine if Lussick gets a run
Or could it be a horses for courses situation where TB picks the best players for the opposition? Where a big pack is better suited or a more mobile pack is needed
I respectfully disagree re Tanginoa. Ive thought for a few seasons we've actually lacked a grunt forward that's no frills and simply runs hard and hurts the opposition in attack and defence. I think its nice to have that balance in a team and while he's doing his job and gaining confidence he will only improve hopefully!I put Lane and Perrett ahead of Tanginoa so if Lussick gets a run, I think Kelepi misses out. Not saying I think that should happen but if someone does eventually drop off, it's not Lane and Perrett. Reason being, Lane and Perrett use the ball and our style is built around second phase play. Tanginoa has had a couple of good games but there are not a lot of strings to his bow. Part of me thinks that he is a good point of contrast; he tucks it under his arm and runs straight and hard. He has made some decent yards so far this year. However, I think he offers a little less than the others.
In saying that, he shouldn't be dropped for Lussick unless he plays a couple of sub-par matches and Darcy tears in hard.
Thanks Chips! 🙂
Dont fix what aint broken, hope someone else hasnt said thatLoving Lane's work so far this season, but Lussick brings more aggression and experience - provided he stops giving away silly penalties and/or drop balls.
No harm alternating Lane occasionally to Blacktown, as part of his development.
What a pack with a fit and fired-up Darcy as well.
For the first time in two years, Darcy has serious competition for his spot. He will need to step up to earn/keep it.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |