HK_Eagle
First Grader
Do we have a Jamie Gao character in the team whom may be trembling?I think he could take a page out of the Roger Rogerson playbook and put a Sydney White Pages to good use.
Do we have a Jamie Gao character in the team whom may be trembling?I think he could take a page out of the Roger Rogerson playbook and put a Sydney White Pages to good use.
That was a horrible case.Do we have a Jamie Gao character in the team whom may be trembling?
Beyond horrible, but not surprising given the life RR had woven till thenThat was a horrible case.
Agreed. As much as it pisses us off after a game like that, Seibs knows how to play the media game with the ultimate goal of us moving forwardDo you honestly think spraying the players in public would be beneficial for anyone other than the fans? Remind me how often the really successful coaches do it?
He appeared quite pissed off in my opinion... both in the coaches box & in the presser.... agree what he says to the media most likely isn't the same message behind closed doors you would hope!Agreed. As much as it pisses us off after a game like that, Seibs knows how to play the media game with the ultimate goal of us moving forward
#whiteantHe lost a large portion of the team due to the fact he couldn't coach or had zero ideas on how to get out of a slump of losses.
His cliche book of quotes did not work in changing game plans or getting the best out of players.
Quite regularly I would argue. Sticky does it now and then. Arthur did it last week. No one’s suggesting it’s a weekly occurrence but when they deserve it, I think it’d send a stronger signal than a ‘private’ baking. It makes the team more accountable to the fans.Do you honestly think spraying the players in public would be beneficial for anyone other than the fans? Remind me how often the really successful coaches do it?
Quite regularly I would argue. Sticky does it now and then. Arthur did it last week. No one’s suggesting it’s a weekly occurrence but when they deserve it, I think it’d send a stronger signal than a ‘private’ baking. It makes the team more accountable to the fans.
Stickys won one hasn’t he? Wouldn’t call Bellamy an easy happy go lucky type of coach and he goes alright. It’s horses for courses and I feel our playing group would benefit from a public rev up. Just my opinion though.To be fair when was the last time Sticky or Arthur won a comp?
That was over 20 years ago and the game has changedStickys won one hasn’t he? Wouldn’t call Bellamy an easy happy go lucky type of coach and he goes alright. It’s horses for courses and I feel our playing group would benefit from a public rev up. Just my opinion though.
Haters is a strong word. ‘Critics’ is more appropriate I would’ve thought.It is all quite comical.
Seibold keeps cool - the haters say he should go off and act like a lunatic
Seibold speaks articulately - the haters say he is a snake
Can’t agree with that. I’ve heard Bellamy publicly call out his players in pressers before - not all the time, but if they’ve deserved it. What’s more, His antics in the dressing rooms at half time and in the box are also on show for the public.That was over 20 years ago and the game has changed
Re Bellamy he is a classic example of doing it behind closed doors. You have seen how he carries on in the box and it rarely carries over to the press conference
there was a lost game a while back .... 40-0 ....Bellamy rarely has to go off. When the Storm lose it's hardly ever by playing really poorly. Most losses are close games.
Seibold is a fatter version of Trent BarrettHe lost a large portion of the team due to the fact he couldn't coach or had zero ideas on how to get out of a slump of losses.
His cliche book of quotes did not work in changing game plans or getting the best out of players.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -8 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -30 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -36 | 0 |