Terry Zarsoff
First Grader
Or Uncle Phil. Or Brent Read when it suits.Penn = Peters= Dean Ritchie
Or Uncle Phil. Or Brent Read when it suits.Penn = Peters= Dean Ritchie
I have no idea who it should be Budgie but one thing's for sure, we desperately need a change of coach, without Turbo's superhuman effort last year we probably don't even make the 8 let alone the top 4, in my opinion we've already wasted enough years on Hasler, another 2 as has been suggested is only prolonging the pain, I'd be prepared to give any of the above a crack as long as they have an understanding of the modern game, unfortunately Hasler doesn't seem to have a clue and I don't see him developing an understanding between now and next MarchIf not Des, then who?
I really can't stand the thought of Flanagan.
Who are the assistants to Bellamy and Robinson? They seem to be well trained.
Is Steven Hales a possibility?
Genuine questions. No need to blast away 😉😳🙃
I never got off it, veganism is a gateway to Satan.I think we should get back on the calves blood
Said it in another thread but will say it here.
Agree that this year has been a worry however considering we were within a game of the GF last year and the distributed nature of this year I can not get my head around the calls for change. In my view, Des has earnt at least the first 6 games of next year (at a min) before we make changes.
The five / six years of Des .400 win % doesn't sway you?
The 1 win in 2.5 years against a top 4 team doesn't?
The 2 wins in a full season against a top 8 team doesn't?
The 2nd worst defensive streak in the history of the game over 20 games doesn't?
Equaling the clubs ever worst loss streak already, and possibly beating that now doesn't?
The making the finals 2 from 5 years after this year doesn't?
The player exodus and behavioral issues don't?
Des insistence that a failing Crusher remain recruiter after failing all KPI's doesn't?
It's the next 6 games, that makes the difference?
You were presenting a very good argument but let yourself by not including the other half of the recruitment crew.The person who didn’t do a character assessment of the players who have caused such problems of recent timesThe five / six years of Des .400 win % doesn't sway you?
The 1 win in 2.5 years against a top 4 team doesn't?
The 2 wins in a full season against a top 8 team doesn't?
The 2nd worst defensive streak in the history of the game over 20 games doesn't?
Equaling the clubs ever worst loss streak already, and possibly beating that now doesn't?
The making the finals 2 from 5 years after this year doesn't?
The player exodus and behavioral issues don't?
Des insistence that a failing Crusher remain recruiter after failing all KPI's doesn't?
Des not speaking to anyone in reserve grade (Segayaro) about expectations doesn't?
It's the next 6 games, that makes the difference?
You were presenting a very good argument but let yourself by not including the other half of the recruitment crew.The person who didn’t do a character assessment of the players who have caused such problems of recent times
Yeah I’m not really sure what Cleal’s input has been and obviously he had issues at the Dogs but how much say do you reckon he’d be getting at Manly given the last name of the other recruiter and how much favourable press does said recruiter get as opposed to Cleal?Get what you're saying mate, but I was referring to this mainly in that subject:
A section of Michael Chammas' deep dive into the Bulldogs has caused a considerable stir at Manly. It surrounds the role of former Sea Eagles great Noel "Crusher" Cleal. He is responsible for recruiting and identifying talent, but when he was at the dogs, then chair Ray Dib, singled him out when discussing the loss of faith in CEO Raelene Castle and her judgement when it came to then coach Des Hasler.
"She wanted to extend Des 22 months out from his contract end date," Dib said. "She also wanted to extend Cleal's contract when it was clear to all of us he was struggling to develop any players into first graders. He didn't reach any of his KPIs in four years. Des begged me to keep Cleal on board and Raelene backed him, but the board had lost trust in her judgement by then."
There are Manly elements also questioning Cleal. His colleague, Scott Fulton, has either discovered or recruited the majority of their top-30 players. I've been told Cleal's big move was getting Andrew Davey. He's whole hearted but not a big player in the Manly machine.
Yeah I think Noel has other business interests and he is only a part time member of staff.Yeah I’m not really sure what Cleal’s input has been and obviously he had issues at the Dogs but how much say do you reckon he’d be getting at Manly given the last name of the other recruiter and how much favourable press does said recruiter get as opposed to Cleal?
Pretty sure he doesn’t do much these days nor is being paid much to do so.Yeah I think Noel has other business interests and he is only a part time member of staff.
Does some work behind the scences mentoring players and helps out in other areas as well.
40 years of sample side mate as far as coaches who come from the club.I've been thinking about this whole idea of Manly needing a Manly coach. "We need someone that understands the place/and or has played for the club" I hear/read often.
Then they point to Bob Fulton and Des Hasler as examples of confirming that given their premiership success. Contrasting that is that Peter Sharp and Trent Barrett as non Manly men who have failed miserably also confirm the theory.
Does anybody see what's wrong with this?
1. The sample size is so small
2. Bob Fulton and Des Hasler are some of the greatest coaches the NRL has seen
3. Peter Sharp and Trent Barrett are some of the worst.
To be clear I don't want Des to leave the club entirely and nor do I want him to be replaced by a clearly inferior coach just for the sake of it.
But the team has checked out on Des and that is a massive concern. I get that a Bellamy, Bennett or Robinson isn't going to turn up on our doorstep either for next year. So there is no clear immediate alternative.
But I just hope the club isn't being limited by some thinking that the next coach needs to be a Manly man.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |