Darren said:It would seem possible with Harrison being let go. He isn't setting the world on fire and we have an abundance of backrowers (choc, glenn, buhrer, chee kam and goodall coming through) You can't see us carrying 2nd rowers on the bench next year as I imagine Buhrer will start? We are probably looking at another impact prop (faaoso) This would work well, Kite, King, Cunningham, Rose, Mauro and Jake T. Can't see Robinson and Skinner staying for too long. I can tell you from someone close to the club that Jake T is seen as a Webcke type franchise player for next ten years!!
Stevo said:Chee kam is huge. He'd probably be ready to go now. Not so sure about the other blokes.
joeboy said:Just read Daniel Harrison told to look for another club, although under contract for next year. Salary cap issues... Hopefully it means the deal with snake is done.
master blaster said:your kidding,I thought Harrison was going great guns
eagles2win said:Harrison could bite us eventually.
Seems to be getting better each game.
Heading back to the Dogs apparently
the mauler said:eagles2win said:Harrison could bite us eventually.
Seems to be getting better each game.
Heading back to the Dogs apparently
How the hell could he be goin to the dogs?? They've got enough backrowers to field 3 teams ffs!! And the salary cap?? Have they got one???
Can't wait to see how many players they have to let go. We've lost 4 players and are still under the pump, and they've bought Trex, Inu,Perrett Bros, upgraded Kasiano and now want Harrison. Just doesnt stack up for mine.
Rambo1987 said:the mauler said:eagles2win said:Harrison could bite us eventually.
Seems to be getting better each game.
Heading back to the Dogs apparently
How the hell could he be goin to the dogs?? They've got enough backrowers to field 3 teams ffs!! And the salary cap?? Have they got one???
Can't wait to see how many players they have to let go. We've lost 4 players and are still under the pump, and they've bought Trex, Inu,Perrett Bros, upgraded Kasiano and now want Harrison. Just doesnt stack up for mine.
At Manly 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
At Canterbury 1 + 1 + 1 = 1.5
Ronald Jock said:And why would he go to the Bulldogs where he would be behind Trex and Pritchard?
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 20 |
2 | Warriors | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
3 | Storm | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 135 | 16 |
4 | Raiders | 11 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 64 | 16 |
5 | Sharks | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 70 | 14 |
6 | Rabbitohs | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 14 |
7 | Cowboys | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | -32 | 13 |
8 | Broncos | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 42 | 12 |
9 | Sea Eagles | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 18 | 12 |
10 | Dragons | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -11 | 12 |
11 | Tigers | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | -54 | 12 |
12 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 10 |
13 | Roosters | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | -46 | 10 |
14 | Eels | 11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | -79 | 10 |
15 | Titans | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -100 | 10 |
16 | Panthers | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 9 |
17 | Knights | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | -74 | 8 |