Rugby Australia: A Cautionary Tale

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
I will try to spell it this way but it is going to be a very long spelling list .......


23 Famous Scientists Who Are Not Atheists

23 Scientists who are not atheists
  1. Professor Christian Anfinsen* (Nobel Prize for Chemistry, biochemistry of RNA, Johns Hopkins University): “I think that only an idiot can be an atheist! We must admit that there exists an incomprehensible power or force with limitless foresight and knowledge that started the whole universe going in the first place.”
  2. Professor Werner Archer (Nobel Prize for Physiology/Medicine, restriction enzymes and molecular genetics, University of Basel): “I do not think our civilization has succeeded in discovering and explaining all the principles acting in the universe. I include the concept of God among these principles. I am happy to accept the concept without trying to define it precisely. I know that the concept of God helped me to master many questions in life; it guides me in critical situations and I see it confirmed in many deep insights into the beauty of the functioning of the living world.”
  3. Professor D.H.R. Barton*** (Nobel Prize for Chemistry, conformational analysis in organic chemistry, Texas A&M University): “God is Truth. There is no incompatibility between science and religion. Both are seeking the same truth.”
  4. Professor Ulrich Becker** (High energy particle physics, MIT): “How can I exist without a creator? I am not aware of any answer ever given.”
  5. Professor Steven Bernasek (Solid state chemistry, Princeton University): “I believe in the existence of God. His existence is apparent to me in everything around me, especially in my work as a scientist. On the other hand I cannot prove the existence of God the way I might prove or disprove a (scientific) hypothesis.”
  6. Dr. Francis Collins* (Medicine, former Director of the Human Genome Project, Director, National Institutes of Health, author of “The Language of God”): “Freeing God from the burden of special acts of creation does not remove Him as the source of the things that make humanity special, and of the universe itself. It merely shows us something of how He operates.”
  7. Professor Freeman Dyson*,*** (Theoretical physics, Princeton Institute for Advanced Study): “I do not make any clear distinction between mind and God. God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension. God may be either a world-soul or a collection of world-souls. So I am thinking that atoms and humans and God may have minds that differ in degree but not in kind.”
  8. Sir John Eccles*** (Nobel Prize, neurochemistry): “If I consider reality as I experience it, the primary experience I have is of my own existence as a self-conscious being, which I believe is God-created.”
  9. Professor Manfred Eigen (Nobel Prize for Chemistry, fast reaction kinetics, Director Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Gottingen): “…religion and science neither exclude nor prove one another.”
  10. Professor John Fornaess* (Mathematics, Princeton Univ.): “I believe that there is a God and that God brings structure to the universe at all levels from elementary particles to human being to superclusters of galaxies.
  11. Professor P.C.C. Garnham*** (Medical protozoology, University of London): “God originated the universe or universes… At some stage in evolution when proto-humans were sufficiently advanced, God created the human soul… By faith and by appreciation of scientific necessity, God must exist.”
  12. Professor Conyers Herring* (Solid state physics, Princeton University): “We live in a hard, real universe, to which we have to adapt. God is a characteristic of that universe—indeed a miraculous characteristic—that makes that adaption possible. Things such as truth, goodness, even happiness, are achievable, by virtue of a force that is always present, in the here and now and available to me personally.”
  13. Professor Vera Kistiakowsky* (Experimental Nuclear Physics, MIT and Mount Holyoke College): “I am satisfied with the existence of an unknowable source of divine order and purpose and do not find this in conflict with being a practicing Christian.”
  14. Professor Sir Neville Mott*** (Nobel Prize for physics, solid state physics, Cambridge University): “...we can and must ask God which way we ought to go, what we ought to do, how we ought to behave.”
  15. Professor Robert Neumann* (nuclear and isotope chemistry and physics, Princeton University): “The existence of the universe requires me to conclude that God exists.”
  16. Professor Edward Nelson* (Mathematics, Princeton University): “I believe in, pray to, and worship God.”
  17. Dr. Arno Penzias* (Nobel Prize for physics for first observation of the universal microwave background radiation, Vice-President for Research, AT&T Bell Laboratories): “…by looking at the order in the world, we can infer purpose and from purpose we begin to get some knowledge of the Creator, the Planner of all this. This is, then, how I look at God. I look at God through the works of God’s hands and from those works imply intentions. From these intentions, I receive an impression of the Almighty.
  18. Rev. Professor John Polkinghorne*** (Theoretical elementary particle physics, President, Queens College, Cambridge University): “I take God very seriously indeed. I am a Christian believer (indeed, an ordained Anglican priest), and I believe that God exists and has made Himself known in Jesus Christ.”
  19. Professor Abdus Salam*** (Nobel Prize for physics (elementary particle theory), Director, International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste): “Now this sense of wonder leads most scientists to a Superior Being—der Alte, the Old One, as Einstein affectionately called the Deity—a Superior Intelligence, the Lord of all Creation and Natural Law.”
  20. Professor Arthur Schawlow* (Nobel Prize for Physics [laser physics], Stanford University): “It seems to me that when confronted with the marvels of life one must ask why and not just how. The only possible answers are religious… I find a need for God in the universe and in my own life.”
  21. Professor Wolfgang Smith (Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, Oregon State University. His theoretical work provided the key for solving the re-entry problem in space flight): “If the physics of the last century prompted atheism, the physics of today is inciting at least the most thoughtful of its votaries to re-examine ‘the question of God.'”
  22. Professor Charles Townes* (Nobel Prize for physics, development of the MASER/LASER, University of California, Berkeley): “I believe in the concept of God and in His existence.”
  23. Professor Eugene Wigner* (Nobel Prize for physics, applications of symmetry principles—group theory to quantum mechanics—Princeton University): “The concept of God is a wonderful one—it also helps us makes decisions in the right direction. We would be very different, I fear, if we did not have that concept.”

Hey Bozo, I wasnt referring to posters here with "brainwashed", I was referring to Israel Folau after reading the article.
 
I spent a year studying astrophysics at ANU, happy to send transcripts if you want proof :)
Congratulations on the study... however, I dare say that every university in the Western world adheres to a certain text which has been scribed or “proven” by people other than the students themselves. Then let’s not forget the fact that what is deemed to be an absolute truth yesterday... Einstein’s theory of relativity for example, is suddenly a little skewered today.

While you’re at it, can you explain why Haeckels embryo chart (a huge part of the evolutionary argument) is still taught in so many colleges and schools around the world? Because it was exposed as fraudulent many years ago. Better still, why was it taught at all? Who is responsible for allowing such rubbish to be passed as scientific fact? Why did science go to the extreme of creating such an elaborate lie in the first place?

And yes, I would love to read the unequivocal proof that science has been able to establish about an event which is said to have taken place13 odd billion years ago ( in layman’s terms of course, not in random numbers and letters that only a small minority are able to make any sense of... I didn’t attend ANU.)
 
Last edited:
I spent a year studying astrophysics at ANU, happy to send transcripts if you want proof :)
Perhaps you could help NASA develop some of that amazing 1960’s technology they used to get themselves to the moon (and back) fifty years ago. ‘Cause everything has become so much easier in the last five decades due to technological advances... except for landing a spacecraft on the lunar surface.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you could help NASA develop some of that amazing 1960’s technology they used to get themselves to the moon (and back) fifty years ago. ‘Cause everything has become so much easier in the last five decades due to technological advances... except for landing a spacecraft on the lunar surface.
You can guarantee that if there was a worthwhile resource there they would have been back numerous times
 
We need a dedicated philosophy thread for when there’s nothing happening in football worth talking about.
.

dogversuscat.jpg
 
Congratulations on the study... however, I dare say that every university in the Western world adheres to a certain text which has been scribed or “proven” by people other than the students themselves. Then let’s not forget the fact that what is deemed to be an absolute truth yesterday... Einstein’s theory of relativity for example, is suddenly a little skewered today.

While you’re at it, can you explain why Haeckels embryo chart (a huge part of the evolutionary argument) is still taught in so many colleges and schools around the world? Because it was exposed as fraudulent many years ago. Better still, why was it taught at all? Who is responsible for allowing such rubbish to be passed as scientific fact? Why did science go to the extreme of creating such an elaborate lie in the first place?

And yes, I would love to read the unequivocal proof that science has been able to establish about an event which is said to have taken place13 odd billion years ago ( in layman’s terms of course, not in random numbers and letters that only a small minority are able to make any sense of... I didn’t attend ANU.)
If it’s taught at the ANU then we need only refer to the writings of Marx. There is no organisation further to the left than is the ANU.
 
Interesting that the Falous use the David and Goliath story.
It is most likely that Goliath was mentally handicapped and had to be led down the valley like a donkey.
 
Depends what was said, and whether it was fair. I doubt he would be challenging the decision if there was no chance he would win.
It doesn’t matter. He got over $2m in fund raising to fund his legal costs and is seeking $10m in damages. This is a free swing for him.
 
New ARU boss Andy Marinos was one of the Sth African RU players who joined Australian Super League in mid 1990s. He played for the Bulldogs in 1996 coached by Chris Anderson. Later when Marinos was boss of Welsh RU club Gwent Dragons, Anderson became team coach.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
6 5 1 59 12
6 5 1 20 12
6 4 2 53 10
6 4 2 30 10
7 4 2 25 9
7 4 3 40 8
7 4 3 24 8
7 4 3 -8 8
7 4 3 -18 8
7 3 3 20 7
7 3 4 31 6
7 3 4 17 6
6 2 4 -31 6
7 3 4 -41 6
7 2 5 -29 4
6 1 5 -102 4
6 0 6 -90 2
Back
Top Bottom