Cross-Forum-Discussion Round 5 2023 Cross Forum Chat

8559.jpg
Brocko - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .February 23, 2014
MESSAGES: 1,435
Reaction Score: 2,615

How many 6 agains can Melb give away defending their line before someone gets sinbinned 😂


 
8770.jpg
Wolfie - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .January 14, 2015
MESSAGES: 18,558
Reaction Score: 28,012

his hand followed the ball as it was striped, I don't think it was in act of scoring.

I think that close to the line he would have been making the attempt tbh. I'd be annoying if they gave that against us.


 
10189.jpg
Mustafur - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .June 13, 2019
MESSAGES: 4,897
Reaction Score: 7,187

Souths definitely could of won this game with more involvement from Latrell.


 
10189.jpg
Mustafur - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .June 13, 2019
MESSAGES: 4,898
Reaction Score: 7,187

I think that close to the line he would have been making the attempt tbh. I'd be annoyed if they gave that against us.
the ball only went out that way because of the strip if you watch it back.


 
8423.jpg
Sproj - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .September 5, 2013
MESSAGES: 41,846
Reaction Score: 47,613

Well Melbourne sucking for the first three weeks was fun, this has been such a high quality game and they are back.


 
10189.jpg
Mustafur - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .June 13, 2019
MESSAGES: 4,899
Reaction Score: 7,188

Well Melbourne sucking for the first three weeks was fun, this has been such a high quality game and they are back.
I think Souths could of been alot better in attack but outside that I would agree.


 
8423.jpg
Sproj - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .September 5, 2013
MESSAGES: 41,847
Reaction Score: 47,613

I think Souths could of been alot better in attack but outside that I would agree.

Credit to Melbourne's defense, I think Souths have thrown a lot at them and they have repelled it all.


 
10189.jpg
Mustafur - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .June 13, 2019
MESSAGES: 4,900
Reaction Score: 7,189

Credit to Melbourne's defense, I think Souths have thrown a lot at them and they have repelled it all.
Latrell has been invisible in this game, outside that edge play in the second half on the right he really wasn't there when he should of been, plenty of edge plays on the left he should've been there that could of done damage.

I compare that to Walsh or even TMM last year and it's night and day.


 
8423.jpg
Sproj - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .September 5, 2013
MESSAGES: 41,849
Reaction Score: 47,613

Latrell has been invisible in this game, outside that edge play in the second half on the right he really wasn't there when he should of been, plenty of edge plays on the left he should've been there that could of done damage.

I compare that to Walsh or even TMM last year and it's night and day.

Yeah but we all know Mitchell is a bit of myth.


 
8770.jpg
Wolfie - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .January 14, 2015
MESSAGES: 18,560
Reaction Score: 28,014

unless you think burgess arm strength is stronger than the two arm grab of the strip from the storm player.

I think if the Storm player wasn't there he would attempt to put the ball down, absolutely i do. I think its a fair strip in the circumstances. No player in their right mind is going to wait until he's reaching out to put the ball down before making the tackle. Burgess clearly wasnt in the position he was in just to get a play the ball, he was looking for a try.


 
1899.jpg
Big Pete - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .March 11, 2008
MESSAGES: 30,170
Reaction Score: 20,442

My view is that Tom was never going to score from that position, but by going for the strip he got far more close than he otherwise would have. I thought it was smart of Eisenhuth to attempt the play and if it went infront of a different video official they may have a different view of it. However, I think the rule is intended to be reactionary. If the player has no other choice but to strip the ball in a group tackle to prevent the try, they can do so. Obviously Tom in that situation didn't have to rake the ball out.

An interesting case study none the less and I'm happy to accept the ref's call.


 
1947.jpg
Scorchie - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .March 16, 2008
MESSAGES: 3,385
Reaction Score: 3,984

Latrell walking into plays from a standing start. Classic.


 
it's a stupid game for stupid boys
Hey @Dan . What was the restrictions on the cross-forum media. As in, can the others see if you give them emojis? And wasn’t there something like, if they reply to your messages, it won’t show up on our little bell reminder thingy.
 
J_P - nzwarriors.com
JOINED: .August 4, 2020
MESSAGES: 1,912
REACTIONS: 4,740

8255.jpg
LittleDavey - broncoshq.com
JOINED: .March 25, 2013
MESSAGES: 2,651
Reaction Score: 4,109


I agree, but the real question is - do we beat them next week?

Wighton is so important to them IMO.



Should do easily.


 
J_P - nzwarriors.com
JOINED: .August 4, 2020
MESSAGES: 1,913
REACTIONS: 4,740

Why does latrell looks so unfit and over weight for the fullback position. Not fat shaming. But he looks like a middle in terms of build.
I didn't watch the game and haven't seen him this season so maybe he has gained weight but hasn't always been a bit chubby looking for a fullback.


 
Hey @Dan . What was the restrictions on the cross-forum media. As in, can the others see if you give them emojis? And wasn’t there something like, if they reply to your messages, it won’t show up on our little bell reminder thingy.
No the likes don't send across the sites the work to do it would be too big of a change, I might revisit it and see if there is anything I can add that might do something similar
 
Hey @Dan . What was the restrictions on the cross-forum media. As in, can the others see if you give them emojis? And wasn’t there something like, if they reply to your messages, it won’t show up on our little bell reminder thingy.

you can give them to me, and I'll pass them on. :)
 

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
11 7 4 139 18
11 7 4 88 18
13 9 4 81 18
11 7 4 24 18
13 8 5 87 16
12 7 5 15 16
12 7 5 -50 16
12 6 6 -10 14
11 5 6 -31 14
11 5 6 -67 14
12 5 6 -18 13
12 5 6 -26 13
13 6 7 52 12
12 5 7 -93 12
11 3 8 -42 10
13 5 8 -90 10
12 3 9 -59 8
Back
Top Bottom