BroncosHQ.com
Journey Man
That should be enough for the faders.
**** I was off there but I remember being deadset fuming about it. He would have been a grade 1 Hia in todays rules. He was unconcious from memory. He didn't get 10 in the bin then? And 2 weeks is ****ing atrocious.thats them admitting he meant to hit a guy in the back of the head but they just don't care. That situation is among the most dangerous situations I've ever seen on a footy field, very high risk of permanent brain damage considering He brought his full weight onto him when he was defenceless and unawareOates may have come off but he returned later in the game. Remember he had an opportunity to steal the game late but Damien Cook came up with a boot lace tackle to deny him.
Roberts was charged over it and missed two weeks.
It was basically the minimum penalty on both accounts.**** I was off there but I remember being deadset fuming about it. He would have been a grade 1 Hia in todays rules. He was unconcious from memory. He didn't get 10 in the bin then? And 2 weeks is ****ing atrocious.thats them admitting he meant to hit a guy in the back of the head but they just don't care. That situation is among the most dangerous situations I've ever seen on a footy field, very high risk of permanent brain damage considering He brought his full weight onto him when he was defenceless and unaware
It was basically the minimum penalty on both accounts.
It was a bitter pill for Broncos fans to swallow, especially when they threw the book at Pangai Jr only days prior for a contentious crusher tackle on Maloney.
The Knights reportedly scored in an eight tackle set. the NRL refs are so incompetent that they can't even count to 7 (was off a seven tackle set)
"Counting is hard... " Annersley probablyAnnersley says it’s fine.
Annersley says it’s fine.
"If this game was played in a different dimension with different rules then we can't blame the ref. We will not be apologising."Counting is hard you guys... " Annersley probably
But also ... suck **** souths!!
**** sake now these idiots in charge are considering a rule change for the bounced ball situation in the Manly game.
Do not **** with the bounced ball and mid air tackle... simply state that taking a player's legs out like that is a dangerous position.
It put Garrick in a vulnerable position and the defender has a duty of care to not come through and take a player's legs out like that.... job ****ing done!!
The rule is already there for kickers... I dont know why that wasn't applied in this situation anyway.
****ing media are going on about the wrong aspect of the situation and these morons in charge will create a stupid ****ing reactionary rule now.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |