BroncosHQ.com
Journey Man
[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"]
[/st_td_row][st_td]Big Pete - broncoshq.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 11, 2008
MESSAGES: 28,128
Reaction Score: 15,792[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
MESSAGES: 28,128
Reaction Score: 15,792[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
Sure but they were easier than what the typical cross-field kick where the attacking winner has a better chance of claiming it. Also if your front line defence is good, you can avoid having your fullback go one on one with a barnstorming prop. Whereas the wing is always going to be a target for opposition teams.[st_table="45%"][st_tr][st_td_row="2"][/st_td_row][st_td]BeastMode - nzwarriors.com[/st_td][/st_tr][st_tr][st_td="0.7"]JOINED: .March 7, 2015
MESSAGES: 8,616
REACTIONS: 17,587[/st_td][/st_tr][/st_table]
did you watch the Warriors game - there were quite a few contested bombs which Walshy had to field at FB.
as the last line of defense he also had to man up (an failed) on a rampaging Uele who scored. On the wing an attacking winger has limited space and options to hit you. At fullback you have to cover defence from multiple angles and field positions, and tackle anyone from prop to second rowers to halves centres wing and fullback. People with multiple different sizes skill sets and strengths
To say he’s ok at fullback but too small for wing doesn’t make any sense to me.
If he’s too small for wing, then hes too small to be on the field…