Reynolds at it again.

[mave]

To answer the comments on the no-fault stand-down rule...it needs to be an alleged crime that could potentially earn the player a nine-year or more prison sentence. I doubt verbal abuse could ever be that serious (you bunch of #$%&, #$%*). Just practising...

Sorry, but I believe that you are incorrect.

The NFSD policy also carries a Greenberg discretionary power that can be invoked, upon Greenburgs discretion, for offences against females.
Despite the charge, possible sentence, etc.



edit see Dylan Walkers case for reference. He was nowhere near the 11 year threshold ( that was made up on the spot for the DeBelin case from memory).

 

[Kevinward777]

This is a total beat-up.
Put aside for one moment that it is a disliked footballer and ask yourself: Why is this news?

I agree, however he has been charged with a domestic violence offence against a woman has he not? So too the Eels winger. I’m not suggesting he is or isn’t guilty, but it’s just another example of the mish mash setup of those running the game, where discretionary powers can be invoked at will.

 

[pt73]

This is a total beat-up.
Put aside for one moment that it is a disliked footballer and ask yourself: Why is this news?

Because they can’t find anything negative to write about Manly.

 

[Kevinward777]

Yeah...looks to me for all the world that she has entered his house unexpectedly/illegally, and he has freaked out because she's stalking him. Non-story, much as I despise the man.

To answer the comments on the no-fault stand-down rule...it needs to be an alleged crime that could potentially earn the player a nine-year or more prison sentence. I doubt verbal abuse could ever be that serious (you bunch of #$%&, #$%*). Just practising...

So when Dylan Walker pulled his partner’s hair “allegedly” was he facing a nine year custodial sentence?

 

[Freagle]

So when Dylan Walker pulled his partner’s hair “allegedly” was he facing a nine year custodial sentence?

See Mave's comment above - apparently there is a 'discretionary clause' that basically means Greenburg can make up the rules at his whim.

 

[Freagle]

Sorry, but I believe that you are incorrect.

The NFSD policy also carries a Greenberg discretionary power that can be invoked, upon Greenburgs discretion, for offences against females.
Despite the charge, possible sentence, etc.



edit see Dylan Walkers case for reference. He was nowhere near the 11 year threshold ( that was made up on the spot for the DeBelin case from memory).

Ah, got it. So, typical knee-jerk reaction to De Belin's case by the NRL...make up a far-reaching rule on the spot, without proper thought or consultation, and add in a few clauses that allow them to break their own rule. Why am I not surprised...

 

[eaglebuzz]

This isn't news. All he is guilty of here is being a dickhead, which everyone already knew...

 

[Freagle]

Actually - as a mate of mine said earlier in the day, the video/female were probably planted there by the Tigers in the hope he'd blow up, and they could get him off the books...

 

[double hoops]

Really. Is that it. WOW. Small things amuse small minds.

 

[Shoe1]

His sentence: reserve grade for wests

 

[Bring back the.... Biff?]

He will forever be a low **** after his high diving act several years ago when gifty had hold of his leg to earn the dogs a penalty and win the match at brookie

Agreed he jumped the scumbag and the ref knew it but still pumped us anyway

 

[DUFFMAN]

The bloke is a w@nker but can’t see anything wrong in this.
What is he meant to do or say “would you mind leaving please”

 

[Will on the hill]

As Austin Powers once said...She’s a man..man!

Einhorn is Finkle, Finkle is Einhorn.

 

[Freagle]

Agreed he jumped the scumbag and the ref knew it but still pumped us anyway

Then marched us ten when Foran called him on it. Which made the penalty goal within range.

i did get slight satisfaction out of seeing Shayne Haynes face when security rushed out to escort him from the field afterwards... he was oblivious until he turned and saw the angry crowd baying for his blood. Then he looked like he suddenly crapped himself and scuttled off.

 

[wombatgc]

Were they role-playing? was Josh wearing a ball and chain, hence the convict retort.
And is that Chewbacca going down on her?

 

[Kiwi Eagle]

From what I’ve read of it Reynolds shouldn’t be in any trouble, all he did was speak the truth about this bit of work

 

[The Wheel]

Were they role-playing? was Josh wearing a ball and chain, hence the convict retort.
And is that Chewbacca going down on her?

She might have been going Han Solo

 

[Top End Eagle]

From what I’ve read of it Reynolds shouldn’t be in any trouble, all he did was speak the truth about this bit of work

Yes there’s plenty of info on the Kennel. Not saying it’s true but pretty detailed and distressing if it’s made up.

 

[lsz]

A couple of things for me
1. Not sure it is ever okay to speak to someone like that (male or female....no matter what has been done)
2. As always how can anyone tell what is going on from a 30 second clip? Who knows what happened before and after etc

 

[47MVEagle]

He could've been rubbing one out and she barged in on him.

Hahaha that's exactly what I thought.

Still, the verbal abuse isnt a good look & he wasnt exactly exhibiting self-control when he started hitting himself in the head.