Rambofan2
Member
Really? How does your post stand up now?
Source? Sounds like you'e just making **** up now.
Source? Sounds like you'e just making **** up now.
Thanks for the update. If those players wish to seek a release, I am sure I won't be the only fan who will happily see them leave. Aside from the club, I blame christian missionaries. They have a lot to answer for!
Thanks to all those who "liked" my posts and gave awards and feedback. As for those of you who know me personally, and there are a few, thanks . I look forward to seeing you at the games and functions.
Let’s hope Morgan has a big one. He might just surprise you.🙂View attachment 21711
Thought we could use a bit of a laugh 🤣
Here is the info on the Tongan gender fluidity tradition, it is a third gender shared by Tongans, Samoans and HawaiiansVery disappointed in our Samoan heritage players that have chosen not to wear the jersey especially as Samoa openly has 4 genders ...
"Within Samoan society, tolerance of all individuals and their likes, dislikes and choices is very important, and children are not pushed to conform to particular gender roles in the same way that Western children generally are." clearly this quote from a Samoan Culture website is out of step with todays young men of Samoan origin, if our lads are representative of their cohort ...
A quote from a number of media outlets today would seem they may not be so representative of their culture but the missionary influences of the past 150 odd years
Frank Puletua insists homophobia isn’t a part of Polynesian culture as he tells Manly’s pride jumper boycotters to BACKFLIP and play in the rainbow strip.
Some of my favourite young players but ....if you wont wear the jersey that represents inclusion but will wear one that promotes gambling etc ... then I say don't play at all
I hope this is not the beginning of the end of our great club but the beginning of a rebuild of players that want to wear the Manly jersey no matter what pressure is put on them by religion and family.
As a matter of interest (on religion in sport),I was trialling for Manly's SG Ball team on 1970 and was told by one of the selectors, that I was pretty good but as I was no catholic I had no chance.
But hey, who believes in Miracles?
If the Pride jersey is such a good idea I look forward to the other 15 clubs introducing them in the round when they play Manly.Very disappointed in our Samoan heritage players that have chosen not to wear the jersey especially as Samoa openly has 4 genders ...
"Within Samoan society, tolerance of all individuals and their likes, dislikes and choices is very important, and children are not pushed to conform to particular gender roles in the same way that Western children generally are." clearly this quote from a Samoan Culture website is out of step with todays young men of Samoan origin, if our lads are representative of their cohort ...
A quote from a number of media outlets today would seem they may not be so representative of their culture but the missionary influences of the past 150 odd years
Frank Puletua insists homophobia isn’t a part of Polynesian culture as he tells Manly’s pride jumper boycotters to BACKFLIP and play in the rainbow strip.
Some of my favourite young players but ....if you wont wear the jersey that represents inclusion but will wear one that promotes gambling etc ... then I say don't play at all
I hope this is not the beginning of the end of our great club but the beginning of a rebuild of players that want to wear the Manly jersey no matter what pressure is put on them by religion and family.
As a matter of interest (on religion in sport),I was trialling for Manly's SG Ball team on 1970 and was told by one of the selectors, that I was pretty good but as I was no catholic I had no chance.
I agree that it should not have been rolled out during women in league round.Its women in league round FFS. It has and never has been nothing to do with inclusiveness apart from Club Manly have f#cked up. The rest of the rainbow blow up has been only from Club Manly f#cking up. Im All for the cause, but this weekend isn't the place. PVL again has shown NO lack of leadership as the Boss of the League.
At Belrose in the early 80s we thought that the St Pauls and Christian Bros boys got preference for the Manly reps.As a matter of interest (on religion in sport),I was trialling for Manly's SG Ball team on 1970 and was told by one of the selectors, that I was pretty good but as I was no catholic I had no chance.
Very impressive argument. But I don’t think anyone can deduce these matters or reality in this kind of way.Bizarre that an individual's post would be classified as the thoughts of 'so many people' and second that /sarc at the end didn't give away the intent of the post.
However seeing as you want to explore the unrelated nature of taking a stand on 'Religious grounds' - which has been unquestionably touted as the motivation here by Media and players alike - lets confer with some reality on this.
Does the Bible explicity say Homosexuality is a sin? No.
Does the Bible explicitly say Gambling is a sin? No.
So neither are categorically outlined as sinful by the tenet of Christian faith.
OK. So....what about the messaging in modern-day Chsristian Religious teachings?
On Homosexuality:
The Bible clearly teaches that marriage is the exclusive and lifelong union of one man and one woman. Genesis 2 records that marriage was instituted by God from the very beginning and hard-wired into human society.
Same-sex marriage - The Christian Institute
OK - Gay Marriage is not suppported - not because it is explicitly disendorsed, but because Marriage is classified as between a Man and Woman - meaning variations outside this are assumed to be against God's will.
Most Christian churches hold the position that you should 'Love the sinner, but hate the sin'. This is generally interpreted to mean that Christians should show love and compassion to homosexuals, but that homosexuals should not engage in sexual activity. This is because most churches teach that sex should only happen within marriage, which the Church defines as being between a man and a woman.
What does Christianity say about homosexuality? - Human sexuality and relationships - GCSE Religious Studies Revision - BBC Bitesize
See also:
Homosexuality: Not a Sin, Not a Sickness Part II "What The Bible Does and Does Not Say..." | Religious Institute
Homosexuality
https://www.kingswood.edu/wp-content/uploads/A-Biblical-Response-to-Homosexuality-Part-2.pdf
On Gambling:
Although the Bible does not discuss gambling in detail, we can discern from Bible principles that God views gambling as a sin.—Ephesians 5:17. *
See Also:
- Gambling is driven by greed, which God hates. (1 Corinthians 6:9, 10; Ephesians 5:3, 5) Gamblers hope to gain money through the losses of others, but the Bible condemns coveting other people’s possessions.—Exodus 20:17; Romans 7:7; 13:9, 10.
- Gambling, even for small amounts, can arouse a destructive love of money.—1 Timothy 6:9, 10.
- Gamblers often rely on superstitions or luck. However, God views such beliefs as a form of idolatry, which is incompatible with his worship.—Isaiah 65:11.
- Rather than promote a desire to get something for nothing, the Bible encourages hard work. (Ecclesiastes 2:24; Ephesians 4:28) Those who follow the Bible’s advice can “eat food they themselves earn.”—2 Thessalonians 3:10, 12.
Gambling - Christianity
Christians care about gambling because of the harm it can do, to individuals, families, children and society.christianity.org.ukCan Christians Gamble? The Complete Answer
At first glance, gambling seems fun and harmless. But the reality is with casinos, lottery tickets, and online gambling, gambling is becoming more of a problem in people’s lives. Our society today loves instant gratification and get-rich-quick schemes, but the Bible tells Christians not to rely...justdisciple.comA Christian Response to Sports Gambling - Sports Faith
Is gambling a sin? It's a controversial question for many Christians, but here's wisdom on how to approach sports gambling, including Daily Fantasy Sports.sportsfaith.com
There is some ambiguity around both topics - which are nuanced and complex in their own ways. However there is a LOT more debate and diversion around the position of Homosexuality in the Christian faith than there is to Gambling - which is almost universally seen as a worship of Money rather than God, and viewed inherently negatively on most Christian resources I consulted.
So hate to say it, but Gambling should actually present more of a difinitive protest on 'Religious grounds' - if that is indeed the real reason behind this boycott. The Christian teachings are far more united on the sinfulness of Gambling over straight Homosexuality (and this is dimishing the Pride intent - which is about WAAAY more than simple homosexuality alone).
So are the issues 'Totally unrelated?' Maybe - but not on the basis of 'Religious Grounds' mate. That's the hill being chosen to fight on here - so maybe get past the false equivalence and see how 'So many people' might be reading between the lines a bit here on the selectiveness of this protest.
Also there are no eels mentioned in the bible, or broncos or rabbitohs etc. However eagles are referred to more than once. So those clubs should be smited from the NRL.Very impressive argument. But I don’t think anyone can deduce these matters or reality in this kind of way.
Religion and it’s interpretation is very personal and subjective and one can’t objectively lay it all out and impose on people how it can be interpreted. Life doesn’t work that way! Well at least from what I have experienced.
I love how the Simpsons over the years have tackled religion more specifically Christianity. Here is an interesting quote:
Reverend Lovejoy: God has never given up on anyone.
Ned Flanders: What about Sodom and Gomorrah?
Reverend Lovejoy: He lovingly destroyed them.
Christianity via its interpretations can be very hypocritical and intolerant to say the least on the other hand look at some of the organisations that have come from it and the good / love that it has produced. e.g. the salvos, world vision etc..
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |