Probably not , but what else do we doif the story is true that he knocked back a big offer for his part of the club i don't think people not renewing memberships will bother him....unfortunately
Probably not , but what else do we doif the story is true that he knocked back a big offer for his part of the club i don't think people not renewing memberships will bother him....unfortunately
I didn't renew when they sacked Tooves. Or at least tried to. They kept trying to renew me.I think a protest might be the only way the owner gets a message , we have to hurt his bottom line
Probably not , but what else do we do
Sorry for the long title @globaleagle but I needed the word 'positive' in there because we already have the odd Sack Seibold thread. So ...
I'd like waaay better communication from the club. I realise they can't trumpet signings until they're done but there's plenty of other areas that we're left in the dark.
Tell us about injured players on a regular basis. They used to have a weekly physio report. Why don't we have that anymore?
If Seibold is not to be sacked, at least tell us if this is his final year and what the plan is. Wouldn't expect that with any other coach but then he has said that he doesn't want to ... be a coach.
Treat members with a little more respect. The 'membership team' feels like a bunch of work experience kids. Given that they are most people's only contact with the club, get some grownups in.
Be clear on the website about the Top 30 players. There are currently 34 players listed there. What's that?
Under Coaches, there is just one coach listed. Why?
And rather than The Manly Way marketing tool, why not interview a player, coach, physio each week and tell us about their backgrounds, daily/weeky routine, game day etc. Engage us.
That's it from me off the top of my head. Anyone else got any thoughts?
And please try to stick to the positive. The constant chirping of bottom four, dad's army, Seibold is rubbish etc., gets plenty of air on the rest of the site.
Stability? If it wasn't for dodgy chairs we'd still have Twenty as coach!I cant not renew, my heart isn't in that. They dont care if i am a member anyway. I was like Mark with the membership badges (i have 3 x 5 year ones). I was one of thousands who chipped in some heard earned at one stage of the Northern Eagles mess to keep the team alive.
If we want to be positive, here is my main thought (stolen from the Canberra Raiders, who have now made 5 of the last 7 final series, only missed last year on for and against). The Storm, Panthers and Roosters also seem to do alright adhering to this too.
Can the whole club get behind the head coach, whether its the current one or the next one? I don't really care if its the current version because I don't think the next one will be any better qualified.
Appoint a coach with the intent to have them run the show for 10 years plus. Club management need to show faith in the process of selecting the right person or remove themselves from that process. I think the current process at Manly, and many other battling sides, is appoint someone well qualified and see how he goes, with the option to sack them if its not working out.
Stability is strength.
There's certainly enough talent on the Northern Beaches for an NRLW team to pop up. There's a ton of Blues Tag teams (not quite rugby league but close to transferable skills) on the Beaches.Get an NRLW team, stat.
We should be leading in these type of areas, not dragging the chain.
No one will coach Manly for 10 years , they just go from one ( expecting instant success) , to the next one thinking instant success and when that doesn’t happen, the next one and so the cycle goes.I cant not renew, my heart isn't in that. They dont care if i am a member anyway. I was like Mark with the membership badges (i have 3 x 5 year ones). I was one of thousands who chipped in some heard earned at one stage of the Northern Eagles mess to keep the team alive.
If we want to be positive, here is my main thought (stolen from the Canberra Raiders, who have now made 5 of the last 7 final series, only missed last year on for and against). The Storm, Panthers and Roosters also seem to do alright adhering to this too.
Can the whole club get behind the head coach, whether its the current one or the next one? I don't really care if its the current version because I don't think the next one will be any better qualified.
Appoint a coach with the intent to have them run the show for 10 years plus. Club management need to show faith in the process of selecting the right person or remove themselves from that process. I think the current process at Manly, and many other battling sides, is appoint someone well qualified and see how he goes, with the option to sack them if its not working out.
Stability is strength.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 23 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 186 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 23 | 17 | 0 | 6 | 228 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 23 | 16 | 0 | 7 | 138 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 156 | 34 |
5 | Sharks | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 91 | 34 |
6 | Warriors | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 22 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 23 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 87 | 31 |
8 | Roosters | 23 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 102 | 30 |
9 | Dolphins | 23 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 87 | 28 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 23 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 20 | 28 |
11 | Tigers | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -127 | 24 |
12 | Eels | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -132 | 24 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 23 | 9 | 0 | 14 | -151 | 24 |
14 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 23 |
15 | Dragons | 23 | 8 | 0 | 15 | -110 | 22 |
16 | Knights | 23 | 6 | 0 | 17 | -244 | 18 |
17 | Titans | 23 | 5 | 0 | 18 | -207 | 16 |