I wont argue against any of them
Can't believe you disagree with Wiki, what a player
Wiki was a very very good player but why is he in the Hall Of Fame before Terry Randall.
Would of been lucky play first grade in the Manly team from 1973-1978. During this period Randall was an automatic selection in every rep side selected, including two world cups and a Kangaroo tour to England in 1973 and made himself unavailable for the 78 tour when he would of been amongst the first picked.
Just my opinion.
Wiki started as a centre finished up a prop
300 + games
50 + tests
Premiership winner
One of the toughest there was
Need we go on?
Wiki was a very very good player but why is he in the Hall Of Fame before Terry Randall.
Would of been lucky play first grade in the Manly team from 1973-1978. During this period Randall was an automatic selection in every rep side selected, including two world cups and a Kangaroo tour to England in 1973 and made himself unavailable for the 78 tour when he would of been amongst the first picked.
Just my opinion.
His cricket career shouldn’t countRandall will get there, there is still plenty of backfilling to do
Wiki played 55 tests....
His cricket career shouldn’t count
I agree......he pisses on all of themDonny McKinnon
Or even Randall.The fact that Randell isn’t there already is a travesty of justice
Don’t you mean EgorOr even Randall.
IgorDon’t you mean Egor
I can't knock the 4 selected but I'm not sure why they limited it to 4. If there is a rugby league hall of fame then Randall has to be in it, no question.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |